An Argument for Guidelines for Capstones in Unhoused Settings

Area of Science:

• Occupational therapy
• Public health
• Social work

Background:

• Growing interest in occupational therapy doctoral capstones involving individuals experiencing homelessness.
• Recognizing the complexities and historical marginalization faced by this population.
• Identifying the need for ethical and sustainable capstone completion in unhoused settings.

Purpose of the Study:

• To advocate for the development of specific guidelines for occupational therapy doctoral capstones with people experiencing homelessness.
• To present background information and justify the necessity of these guidelines.
• To offer preliminary recommendations for students, faculty, and community agencies.

Main Methods:

• Literature review and synthesis of existing practices.
• Analysis of ethical considerations in research and practice with vulnerable populations.
• Development of preliminary recommendations based on expert opinion and contextual understanding.

Main Results:

• The abstract does not present specific results but outlines the rationale and proposed structure for developing guidelines.
• Highlights the need for careful consideration of power dynamics and potential harm.
• Emphasizes the importance of collaboration between academic institutions and community organizations.

Conclusions:

• Development of clear guidelines is crucial for ethical and effective occupational therapy doctoral capstones with homeless populations.
• Guidelines should promote reflection, dialogue, and sustainable practices.
• Ensuring capstones do not unintentionally perpetuate harm is a primary ethical imperative.