Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Automated, High-resolution Mobile Collection System for the Nitrogen Isotopic Analysis of NOx
Published on: December 20, 2016
Unexpected changes in source apportioned results derived from different ambient VOC metrics
Yutong Wu1, Baoshuang Liu1, He Meng2
1State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Urban Ambient Air Particulate Matter Pollution Prevention and Control & Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China; CMA-NKU Cooperative Laboratory for Atmospheric Environment-Health Research, Tianjin 300350, China.
Using mass concentrations instead of volumetric concentrations for volatile organic compound (VOC) source apportionment significantly alters results. Volumetric data offers more practical insights for developing effective air pollution control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Atmospheric Science
- Air Pollution Research
Background:
- Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are key precursors to ozone pollution.
- Most VOC source apportionment studies use mixing ratios, but a significant portion (23%) use mass concentrations.
- Differences in metric choices can impact the accuracy of source apportionment and control strategy development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of using mass concentrations versus volumetric concentrations on VOC source apportionment.
- To assess how metric differences affect the identification and contribution of different VOC sources.
- To determine which metric provides more practical significance for air pollution control.
Main Methods:
- Collected hourly VOC volumetric concentrations in three Chinese cities.
- Converted volumetric concentrations to mass concentrations under standard and actual temperature-pressure conditions.
- Applied positive matrix factorization (PMF) to both volumetric (VC-PMF) and mass concentration (MC-PMF) data.
Main Results:
- Mass concentration data analysis (MC-PMF) led to decreased concentrations of low relative molecular mass (RMM) VOCs and increased concentrations of high RMM VOCs compared to volumetric data (VC-PMF).
- No substantial differences were found between source apportionments using standard versus actual condition mass concentrations.
- Significant differences in the ranking of source contributions were observed between volumetric and mass data analyses.
Conclusions:
- The choice of metric (volumetric vs. mass concentration) significantly alters VOC source apportionment results, particularly affecting the relative contributions of sources emitting low vs. high RMM species.
- Mass concentration data analyses can misrepresent source contributions, potentially hindering effective control strategy development.
- Volumetric concentration data provides more practical significance for developing targeted air pollution control strategies for VOCs.
More Related Videos
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
08:42An Inverse Analysis Approach to the Characterization of Chemical Transport in Paints
Published on: August 29, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Volatilization
Measurement of Air Content in Concrete
The pressure method,...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Standard Deviation of Calculated Results
A broad Gaussian distribution curve has a wider standard deviation, representing a data set with...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...