Validation of Variables for Use in Pediatric Obesity Risk Score Development in Demographically and Racially Diverse

Castle J Funatake1, Marcos Armendáriz1, Stephen Rauch2

  • 1Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

PubMed

Insights

Validated childhood obesity prediction models using five easily obtainable clinical variables performed well across diverse US cohorts. These models effectively identify children at high risk for early obesity, aiding timely intervention.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Health
  • Public Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Childhood obesity is a significant public health concern in the United States.
  • Early identification of at-risk children is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Existing prediction models require validation across diverse populations and settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of previously validated childhood obesity prediction models.
  • To assess model utility using easily obtainable clinical variables from medical records.
  • To test models in four independent, demographically diverse US cohorts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from four prospective cohorts: Latinx, Eating, and Diabetes; Stress in Pregnancy Study; Project Viva; and Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas.
  • Applied a validated risk model using five clinical variables: maternal age, maternal prepregnancy body mass index, birth weight Z-score, weight-for-age Z-score change, and breastfeeding.
  • Employed multivariable logistic regression and assessed model performance using discrimination (Area Under the Curve) and predictive accuracy.

Main Results:

  • Risk models demonstrated excellent discrimination across all four cohorts (AUCs ranging from 0.79 to 0.86).
  • High specificity (≥ 90%) and negative predictive values (≥ 80%) were consistently achieved.
  • Positive predictive values ranged from 62% to 86%, with sensitivity varying from 12% to 53% at the 50th percentile threshold.

Conclusions:

  • The validated risk models performed effectively in independent and diverse US cohorts.
  • The five selected clinical variables are useful for identifying children at high risk for early obesity.
  • These findings support the clinical utility of these variables for early childhood obesity risk assessment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
216
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
139
Obesity01:24

Obesity

The Body Mass Index (BMI) is a numerical value derived from a person's weight and height, used to categorize individuals into weight ranges. It is calculated using the formula: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Obesity is a health condition characterized by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue that poses health risks, often diagnosed with a BMI ≥ 30. This excess fat storage occurs when surplus dietary calories are converted into triglycerides and stored in...
418
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
201
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
157
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
342