Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Bone lid technique versus standard technique for treatment of mandibular lesions
Mona S Sheta1, Rehab F Ghouraba2, Marwa T Ibrahim3
1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, El-Giesh St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt. mona_sheta@dent.tanta.edu.eg.
Background:
Jaw lesions are frequent in the oral and maxillofacial areas. Different methods for enucleating jaw lesions in the oral and maxillofacial sites have been proposed, including the bone lid technique.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of the bone lid technique employing a piezoelectric surgery to the traditional technique in individuals with mandibular lesions.
Materials And Methods:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 24 patients with mandibular lesions. They were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 12 for each group). Group I: the mandibular lesion was excised with bone lid technique using a piezoelectric device, followed by the fixation of the bony window after its repositioning. Group II: the lesion was excised with the traditional method using rotatory burs. Pain, soft tissue healing, bone exposure, bone lid integration, and the volume of the residual bone defect were all assessed clinically and radiographically after one week, one month, and six months.
Results:
All patients in both groups showed adequate soft tissue healing except for one case in group I experienced wound dehiscence and bone lid exposure. The bone lid group reported significantly less pain than the usual approach at the 3rd and 7th days. After six months, the volume of bone defect filling was considerably higher in the bone lid group compared to the conventional group.
Conclusion:
The bone lid technique was an effective procedure in the management of mandibular lesions compared to the standard method. Besides, this technique provides better bone healing and reduces bone loss.
Trial Registration:
This clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov on 14/8/2023 and had registration number NCT05987930.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Local Anesthetics: Common Agents and Their Applications
Cocaine is an ester of benzoic acid and methylecgogine. It is used to anesthetize and vasoconstrict locally. Currently, it is used primarily for topical applications. It is beneficial for surgeries on the upper respiratory tract, providing anesthesia and shrinking the mucosa. Cocaine in the form of cocaine hydrochloride is...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...

