Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attenuation estimation with the zero-crossing technique: phantom studies.

J Ophir, M A Ghouse, L A Ferrari

    Ultrasonic Imaging
    |April 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Recursive algorithms for implementing digital image filters.

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2012
    Same author

    Elastography of beef muscle.

    Meat science·2011
    Same author

    The use of elastography to measure quality characteristics of pork semimembranosus muscle.

    Meat science·2011
    Same author

    The anti-inflammatory target A(3) adenosine receptor is over-expressed in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease.

    Cellular immunology·2009
    Same author

    A deconvolution filter for improvement of time-delay estimation in elastography.

    IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2008
    Same author

    Multiresolution imaging in elastography.

    IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2008
    Same journal

    A Multi-Task Segmentation and Classification Network Based on Ultrasound Images for Predicting the Grading of Ascites in the Abdominal Cavity.

    Ultrasonic imaging·2026
    Same journal

    Hybrid Physics-Driven Deep Learning for Enhanced Ultrasound Image Quality and Speckle Noise Suppression.

    Ultrasonic imaging·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Super-Resolution Ultrasound Contrast Imaging in Differentiating Benign From Malignant Breast Tumors.

    Ultrasonic imaging·2026
    Same journal

    A Novel Preprocessing Method for Common Carotid Artery Ultrasound Images Based on Phase Asymmetry Metric and Non-subsampled Shearlet Transform.

    Ultrasonic imaging·2026
    Same journal

    Generalized Null Subtraction Factor: A Post-Filtering Framework for Contrast Enhancement in Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging.

    Ultrasonic imaging·2026
    Same journal

    Fourier Beamforming of Ultrasound Signals From Chirp Transmits Using the Chirp Scaling Algorithm.

    Ultrasonic imaging·2026
    See all related articles

    Accurate global attenuation coefficient estimation is possible using pulse echo methods. However, local estimations show significant variability, which is reduced in specific transducer zones.

    Area of Science:

    • Ultrasound physics
    • Medical imaging
    • Biomedical engineering

    Background:

    • Accurate estimation of ultrasound attenuation coefficient is crucial for quantitative medical imaging.
    • Pulse echo methods offer a non-invasive approach for assessing tissue properties.
    • Understanding transducer characteristics impacts estimation accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate global and local attenuation coefficient estimation using a pulse echo method.
    • To compare the performance of focused and unfocused transducers in attenuation estimation.
    • To identify factors influencing the accuracy and variability of attenuation coefficient measurements.

    Main Methods:

    • Employed a pulse echo technique utilizing the rate of decay of zero crossing density.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized both focused and unfocused 3.5 MHz ultrasound transducers.
  • Performed estimations on a phantom with varying attenuation coefficients.

    • Main Results:

    • Good global attenuation coefficient estimates were achieved with both transducer types over a 2:1 range.
    • Local attenuation coefficient estimations exhibited substantial bias errors and high variability.
    • Variability in local estimates decreased within the focal zone of the focused transducer and the far field of the unfocused transducer.

    Conclusions:

    • Pulse echo methods can provide reliable global attenuation coefficient estimations.
    • Local attenuation estimation accuracy is significantly affected by transducer focusing and measurement location.
    • Optimizing transducer selection and measurement zones is essential for precise local attenuation mapping in ultrasound imaging.