Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
Published on: October 18, 2024
Evaluating perceived technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance in optometry students
Jia Jia Lek1, Kwang Meng Cham1, Mark Merolli2,3
1Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clinical Relevance:
Constant technological improvements require practitioners to be open to adopting technologies such as telehealth for enhanced patient care. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of telehealth adoption will guide stakeholders in making decisions for safe and effective implementation of telehealth.
Background:
Effective use of telehealth improves patient outcomes. It is unclear if optometry students feel supported in using and/or are accepting of telehealth. This study evaluated telehealth acceptance of optometry students, its association with their technology self-efficacy, and whether telehealth training alters this relationship.
Methods:
Final-year optometry students at the University of Melbourne were invited to participate in a telehealth course. A 22-item online survey adapted from the Technology Proficiency Self-Assessment for twenty-first Century Learning was used to evaluate technology self-efficacy pre- and post-learning. Telehealth acceptance was evaluated using a 34-item survey according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology-2. A 5-point Likert scale was used for each item, yielding two total scores. Respondent demographics, frequency of usage and number of devices were recorded. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA and Pearson correlation were used to analyse demographic variables and relationship between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance.
Results:
58 (68%) and 49 (58%) students participated in the pre- and post-learning surveys. Majority were 20-29-year-old females. Students used between two and four devices for online activities, with 62% being online at least hourly. Technology self-efficacy scores (average ± SD) pre- and post-learning were 83.8% ± 8.2 and 87.8% ± 7.1. Telehealth acceptance scores pre- and post-learning were 66.1% ± 9.6 and 73.98% ± 9.9. There was no association with gender, number of devices and frequency of online use for all scores. Correlation between technology self-efficacy and telehealth acceptance was insignificant pre-learning (p = 0.3) but was significant post-learning (p = 0.04).
Conclusion:
Optometry students demonstrated high technology self-efficacy compared to telehealth acceptance. Telehealth training resulted in marked improvement in telehealth acceptance.
