Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Estimation of Treatment Policy Estimands for Continuous Outcomes Using Off-Treatment Sequential Multiple Imputation.
Thomas Drury1, Juan J Abellan1, Nicky Best1
1GSK, London, UK.
New multiple imputation (MI) models address bias from treatment discontinuation in clinical trials. These models improve estimation of treatment effects, especially for continuous outcomes, by accounting for post-discontinuation data, unlike traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Pharmaceutical Research
Background:
- The International Council for Harmonisation E9 (R1) guideline emphasizes precise estimand definition, including handling of intercurrent events (IEs) like treatment discontinuation.
- Traditional methods for continuous repeated measures, such as mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM) and multiple imputation (MI), often use a treatment policy strategy that ignores discontinuation.
- This approach may introduce bias if outcomes differ post-discontinuation or if missing data is more prevalent among discontinuers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and evaluate novel multiple imputation (MI) models designed to accommodate differences in patient outcomes before and after treatment discontinuation.
- To assess the performance of these MI models in the context of planning a Phase 3 clinical trial for a respiratory disease.
- To compare the proposed MI models against traditional analyses that ignore treatment discontinuation.
Main Methods:
- Development of a set of multiple imputation (MI) models capable of handling intercurrent events, specifically treatment discontinuation.
- Evaluation of these MI models using simulated data within the framework of a planned Phase 3 respiratory disease trial.
- Comparison of bias and variance introduced by traditional methods versus the proposed MI models.
Main Results:
- Analyses that ignore treatment discontinuation can lead to substantial bias and underestimation of variability in treatment effects.
- The proposed multiple imputation (MI) models demonstrate the ability to correct for bias introduced by treatment discontinuation.
- While correcting bias, the proposed MI models inevitably result in an increase in the variance of the estimated treatment effect.
Conclusions:
- The proposed multiple imputation (MI) models offer an improvement over traditional analyses that ignore treatment discontinuation in clinical trials.
- The choice of the optimal MI model depends on specific trial characteristics, including design, disease context, and the pattern of observed and missing data post-discontinuation.
- Careful consideration of MI model selection is crucial for accurate estimation of treatment effects in the presence of intercurrent events.
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Censoring Survival Data
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

