Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Learning Modern Laryngeal Surgery in a Dissection Laboratory
Published on: March 18, 2020
Laryngeal cancer relative survival trends from 1972 to 2021 in the Nordic countries
Rayan Nikkilä1, Aaro Haapaniemi2, Timo Carpén3
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Finnish Cancer Registry, Institute for Statistical and Epidemiological Cancer and Research, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Lahti Central Hospital, Päijät-Häme Joint Authority for Health and Wellbeing, Lahti, Finland.
Background And Purpose:
Changes in treatment approaches, characterised by the shift from laryngectomy to a focus on organ-preserving methods may have potentially resulted in lower survival. We aim to identify differences in survival trends for laryngeal cancer (LC) in the Nordic countries over a period of 50 years, and discuss the potential impact of factors such as changes in treatment protocols.
Materials And Methods:
Five-year relative survival (RS) data from 1972 to 2021 were obtained from the NORDCAN database 2.0 which included 33,692 LC cases, of which 85% were diagnosed among men. In the NORDCAN database, the age-standardised RS is calculated using the Pohar Perme estimator with individual International Cancer Survival Standards weights. Joinpoint regression models were used to assess potential shifts in trend over the years in RS.
Results:
While Denmark and Norway demonstrated an increasing trend in 5-year RS from 1972 to 2021, in Finland and Sweden, the 5-year RS among men remained static, without any discernible significant trend. Over the 30-year period from 1992-1996 to 2017-2021, RS improved by 9, 4, 13, and 2 percentage points in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, respectively. Among women in Sweden, a linear negative trend was observed, noticeable as a 16 percentage-point decline in 5-year RS from the earliest to the latest period.
Interpretation:
The underlying causes for the differences in survival trends remain unclear. Besides differences in treatment protocols, several other factors can affect RS making the interpretation of RS trends challenging.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

