Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

160
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
160
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.3K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

101
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
101

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing principal- versus medial-axis accounts of global spatial reorientation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2018
Same author

Environmental scaling influences the use of local but not global geometric cues during spatial reorientation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2017
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.

Jessica Stagner Bodily1, Kent D Bodily2,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Auburn University at Montgomery, 7400 East Drive, Montgomery, AL 36117 USA.

Perspectives on Behavior Science
|August 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans may exhibit suboptimal choice behavior, choosing options that lead to resource loss over time. This study re-examined human data, finding optimal choices in most conditions but suboptimal choices in others, challenging previous assumptions.

Keywords:
Decision makingMatching lawSuboptimal choice

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

675

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

675

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Animal Cognition
  • Decision-Making Psychology

Background:

  • Suboptimal choice behavior, characterized by resource loss, is observed across species in laboratory settings.
  • Optimal choices yield more reinforcement but lack predictive cues, while suboptimal choices offer fewer rewards but provide predictive signals.
  • Previous research indicated pigeons and rats prefer suboptimal choices, while humans tend toward optimal choices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate human choice behavior using a reinforcement-derived definition of optimality.
  • To investigate whether human decision-making aligns with predicted optimal or suboptimal patterns under specific conditions.
  • To refine the understanding of suboptimal choice behavior in humans.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of two previously published human datasets using a reinforcement-derived optimality definition.
  • Comparison of observed choice behavior against predictions based on obtained reinforcement proportions.
  • Examination of choice patterns under varying experimental conditions.

Main Results:

  • Human choice behavior was largely consistent with optimal predictions based on reinforcement outcomes across multiple conditions.
  • In two specific experimental conditions, participants demonstrated a significant preference for the suboptimal alternative.
  • These findings suggest that suboptimal choice behavior can occur in humans under certain circumstances.

Conclusions:

  • The reinforcement-derived definition of optimality provides a framework for assessing human choice behavior.
  • Human participants can exhibit suboptimal choice behavior, contrary to some previous findings.
  • Evaluating choice behavior against obtained reinforcement proportions offers a more accurate assessment of optimality in decision-making tasks.