Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
First Impression01:09

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing self-help interventions for adults with clinical perfectionism: A randomized controlled trial comparing online skills modules to a book.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same author

The quantitative economon model as a novel computational tool for addiction research.

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·2026
Same author

Reward-specific learning parameters change across normative adolescent development and are blunted in youth with high risk for depression.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2025
Same author

Delay Discounting Within Couple Relationships: An Initial Exploration.

Journal of marital and family therapy·2025
Same author

Reward and punishment learning among people with a lifetime history of anxiety, depression, and substance use disorder.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2025
Same author

Quantitative Economon Model of Transactions for Drugs and Other Commodities.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K

Recent Experience Affects Delay Discounting: Evidence across Temporal Framing, Signs, and Magnitudes.

Mariah E Willis-Moore1, Jeremy M Haynes2, Charles C J Frye3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, UT USA.

Perspectives on Behavior Science
|August 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Recent experience significantly alters delay discounting. The order of tasks influences how people value immediate versus delayed rewards, impacting temporal framing and magnitude effects.

Keywords:
Carry-over effectMagnitude effectOrder effectRecent experienceSign effectTemporal frame

More Related Videos

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

675

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.6K
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.3K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

675

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Delay discounting, the reduced valuation of outcomes with increasing delay, is extensively studied.
  • Temporal framing, outcome sign, and magnitude are known to influence discounting.
  • The impact of recent experience (order of task presentation) on these effects remains less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how recent experience modifies established findings in delay discounting.
  • To examine the interplay between temporal framing, outcome sign, and recent experience.
  • To assess the influence of recent experience on the magnitude effect in delay discounting.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to assess the impact of task order on delay discounting.
  • Experiment 1 manipulated temporal framing (e.g., "1 week" vs. "February 15") across gains and losses.
  • Experiment 2 examined the magnitude effect ($10 vs. $100) under varying orders of task completion.

Main Results:

  • Recent experience altered temporal framing effects, with date-framed delays showing carryover effects.
  • The magnitude effect was absent initially but emerged after participants completed a second magnitude task.
  • Steeper discounting occurred for smaller amounts ($10) when preceded by larger amounts ($100), and vice versa.

Conclusions:

  • Recent experience is a critical factor that modulates delay discounting behavior.
  • Experimental design must account for the order of presentation to accurately interpret findings.
  • Understanding recent experience's role is vital for developing effective interventions to manage delay discounting.