Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System
Published on: June 12, 2019
Effect of Coal Rank and Coal Facies on Nanopore-Fracture Structure Heterogeneity in Middle-Rank Coal Reservoirs
Cangyan Xiao1, Donglin Han1, Junjian Zhang2
1School of Transportation Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Abstract:
Considerable variations in microscopic and industrial components (ash, moisture, volatile matter, etc.) have been reported within identical coal seams. These disparities in coal quality and pore structure within the same coal seam profoundly affect the drainage of deep coalbed methane (DCBM). This study focuses on 22 coal samples collected from two wells in the Benxi Formation of the central and eastern parts of the Ordos Basin. First, the coal facies were determined for all samples using submicroscopic components, and then, the adsorption pore and seepage pore structures were studied through CO2/N2 adsorption and mercury intrusive tests. Subsequently, the study delves into the correlation between coal rank, coal facies, and the distribution of the pore structures across various pore sizes, elucidating the primary controlling factors influenced by coal rank and coal phase. The results are as follows: (1) For a given coal seam, R o, max exhibits minimal variation among the samples, which suggests R o, max is not the primary factor affecting pore structure. Conversely, the ash content occupies the pore space, thereby revealing a negative correlation between the ash content and adsorption pore volume (PV). (2) On the basis of the texture preservation index (TPI) and gelatification index (GI), coal facies were classified into moist forest swamp facies (type A), moist herbaceous swamp facies (type B), and water-covered herbaceous swamp facies (type C). Type A is characterized by higher TPI, lower GI, and ash content, whereas type C exhibits lower TPI, higher GI, and ash content. (3) Type A samples, with the lowest ash content, display larger PV and specific surface area (SSA) compared with type B, while type C has the lowest values. Type C, with the highest vitrinite content, predominantly consists of semibright and bright coal, prone to microcracks, which results in a higher seepage PV compared with types A and B. (4) The coal facies represent variations in ash content and microscopic components, which significantly impacts both adsorption and seepage pores. Moist forest swamp facies samples are characterized by micropore development and the highest content of adsorbed gas. Herbaceous swamp facies samples display macropore development and the highest content of free gas.
More Related Videos
12:18Pore-scale Imaging and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoir Rock Wettability at Subsurface Conditions Using X-ray Microtomography
Published on: October 21, 2018
07:23Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Particle Size and Methane Sorption Capacity in Shale
Published on: August 2, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Pore Size Distribution
Adequate...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Microcracking in Concrete