Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating Early Events and Long-Term Effects of ACL Injuries for Osteoarthritis Progression
Published on: September 29, 2023
Investigating the Bone Bruise Patterns in Pediatric Patients With Contact and Noncontact Acute Anterior Cruciate
Jay Moran1,2, Jason Z Amaral3,2, Michael Lee1,2
1Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Insights
Pediatric anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears show distinct bone bruise patterns. Contact ACL tears in children are linked to central medial femoral condyle bruising on MRI, unlike noncontact tears.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Pediatric sports medicine
- Radiology
Background:
- Bone bruises on MRI in adults with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears correlate with injury mechanisms.
- Limited research exists on bone bruise patterns and injury mechanisms in pediatric ACL tears.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the number and location of bone bruises in pediatric patients with contact versus noncontact ACL tears.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 109 pediatric patients (boys ≤14, girls ≤12) undergoing ACL reconstruction.
- Mechanism of injury (contact vs. noncontact) and preoperative MRI scans were analyzed for bone bruises.
- A grid-based mapping technique assessed bone bruises on tibiofemoral joint images.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in demographics, time to MRI, or meniscal tears between contact and noncontact groups.
- Contact ACL tears were associated with a higher likelihood of centrally located medial femoral condyle (MFC) bruising (OR 4.3).
- Contact ACL tears showed less bruising on the anterior lateral tibial plateau (OR 0.27) compared to noncontact tears.
Conclusions:
- Children with contact ACL tears are significantly more likely to have centrally located MFC bone bruises.
- These findings suggest distinct injury mechanisms based on bone bruise patterns in pediatric ACL tears.
- Further research is needed to explore the link between these bone bruise patterns and articular cartilage damage risk.
Background:
In adults with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, bone bruises on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans provide insight into the underlying mechanism of injury. There is a paucity of literature that has investigated these relationships in children with ACL tears.
Purpose:
To examine and compare the number and location of bone bruises between contact and noncontact ACL tears in pediatric patients.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
Boys ≤14 years and girls ≤12 years of age who underwent primary ACL reconstruction surgery between 2018 and 2022 were identified at 3 separate institutions. Eligibility criteria required detailed documentation of the mechanism of injury and MRI performed within 30 days of the initial ACL tear. Patients with congenital lower extremity abnormalities, concomitant fractures, injuries to the posterolateral corner and/or posterior cruciate ligament, previous ipsilateral knee injuries or surgeries, or closed physes evident on MRI scans were excluded. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on a contact or noncontact mechanism of injury. Preoperative MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of bone bruises in the coronal and sagittal planes using fat-suppressed T2-weighted images and a grid-based mapping technique of the tibiofemoral joint.
Results:
A total of 109 patients were included, with 76 (69.7%) patients sustaining noncontact injuries and 33 (30.3%) patients sustaining contact injuries. There were no significant differences between the contact and noncontact groups in terms of age (11.8 ± 2.0 vs 12.4 ± 1.3 years; P = .12), male sex (90.9% vs 88.2%; P > .99), time from initial injury to MRI (10.3 ± 8.1 vs 10.4 ± 8.9 days; P = .84), the presence of a concomitant medial meniscus tear (18.2% vs 14.5%; P = .62) or lateral meniscus tear (69.7% vs 52.6%; P = .097), and sport-related injuries (82.9% vs 81.8%; P = .89). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of combined lateral tibiofemoral (lateral femoral condyle + lateral tibial plateau) bone bruises (87.9% contact vs 78.9% noncontact; P = .41) or combined medial tibiofemoral (medial femoral condyle [MFC] + medial tibial plateau) bone bruises (54.5% contact vs 35.5% noncontact; P = .064). Patients with contact ACL tears were significantly more likely to have centrally located MFC bruising (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.6-11; P = .0038) and less likely to have bruising on the anterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.097-0.76; P = .013).
Conclusion:
Children with contact ACL tears were 4 times more likely to present with centrally located MFC bone bruises on preoperative MRI scans compared with children who sustained noncontact ACL tears. Future studies should investigate the relationship between these bone bruise patterns and the potential risk of articular cartilage damage in pediatric patients with contact ACL tears.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
05:44Author Spotlight: Double Posteromedial Approach for Treating Posterior Cruciate Ligament Cysts
Published on: October 20, 2023