Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Multiplex Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by Isotope-dilution HPLC-MS/MS of Antibiotics in Critical Illnesses
Published on: August 30, 2018
Antibiotics Removal during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock Patients: Mixed Modality Versus
Fiorenza Ferrari1,2, Paola Milla3, Marco Sartori1
1Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza (IRRIV), San Bortolo Hospital, Azienda ULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy.
Background And Objective:
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) plays a critical role in antimicrobial removal, particularly for low-molecular-weight drugs with low plasma protein binding, low distribution volume and hydrophilicity. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes represent a new generation in dialysis technology, enhancing diffusive modality efficacy and increasing the cut-off from 30 to 45 kDa, crucial for middle molecule removal. This monocentric randomized crossover pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of continuous haemodialysis with MCO membrane (MCO-CVVHD) on the removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem compared with continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration with standard high-flux membrane (HFM-CVVHDF).
Methods:
Twenty patients were randomized to undergo MCO-CVVHD followed by HFM-CVVHDF or vice versa. Extraction ratio (ER), effluent clearance (Cleff) and treatment efficiency were assessed at various intervals. Antibiotic nadir plasma levels were measured for both treatment days.
Results:
HFM-CVVHDF showed greater ER compared with MCO-CVVHD for meropenem (β = - 8.90 (95% CI - 12.9 to - 4.87), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = - 8.29 (95% CI - 13.5 to - 3.08), p = 0.002) and Cleff for each antibiotic (meropenem β = - 10,206 (95% CI - 14,787 to - 5787), p = 0.001); tazobactam (β = - 4551 (95% CI - 7781 to - 1322), p = 0.012); piperacillin (β = - 3913 (95% CI - 6388 to - 1437), p = 0.002), even if the carryover effect influenced the Cleff for meropenem and tazobactam. No difference was observed in nadir plasma concentrations or efficiency for any antibiotic. Piperacillin (β = - 38.1 (95% CI - 47.9 to - 28.3), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = - 4.45 (95% CI - 6.17 to - 2.72), p < 0.001) showed lower nadir plasma concentrations the second day compared with the first day, regardless the filter type.
Conclusion:
MCO demonstrated comparable in vivo removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem to HFM.
Insights
Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes show comparable removal of piperacillin, tazobactam, and meropenem compared to high-flux membranes (HFM) during renal replacement therapy. This study found similar antibiotic plasma levels regardless of the membrane type used.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Pharmacokinetics
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is crucial for removing low-molecular-weight, hydrophilic drugs.
- Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes enhance middle molecule removal by increasing the cut-off from 30 to 45 kDa.
- New dialysis technologies like MCO membranes warrant evaluation for antimicrobial drug clearance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the antimicrobial removal efficacy of MCO membranes versus standard high-flux membranes (HFM).
- To evaluate the impact of continuous hemodialysis with MCO membranes (MCO-CVVHD) versus HFM-CVVHDF on piperacillin, tazobactam, and meropenem removal.
- To assess antibiotic plasma levels and treatment efficiency with both membrane types.
Main Methods:
- A monocentric randomized crossover pilot study involving 20 patients.
- Patients underwent both MCO-CVVHD and HFM-CVVHDF treatments in a randomized sequence.
- Key metrics included extraction ratio (ER), effluent clearance (Cleff), and nadir plasma antibiotic levels.
Main Results:
- High-flux membrane hemodialysis (HFM-CVVHDF) demonstrated greater ER and Cleff for meropenem and tazobactam compared to MCO-CVVHD.
- No significant differences were observed in nadir plasma concentrations or overall treatment efficiency between the two membrane types.
- Piperacillin and tazobactam showed lower nadir plasma concentrations on the second treatment day, irrespective of the filter type used.
Conclusions:
- Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes provide comparable in vivo removal of piperacillin, tazobactam, and meropenem to high-flux membranes (HFM).
- The findings suggest MCO membranes are a viable alternative for antibiotic management during RRT.
- Further research may explore the clinical implications of these findings in diverse patient populations.
More Related Videos
07:03Standardized Colon Ascendens Stent Peritonitis in Rats - a Simple, Feasible Animal Model to Induce Septic Acute Kidney Injury
Published on: February 15, 2022
07:11Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Renal Failure: Dose Adjustments
Reduced renal clearance and elimination rate are common outcomes of renal impairment. These alterations lead to a prolonged elimination half-life and an altered apparent volume of distribution for drugs. As a result, dosage adjustments are typically necessary to maintain optimal drug levels in the body.
However, dosage adjustments...
Drug Elimination by Renal Route: Tubular Secretion
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics