Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2025

Sputter Growth and Characterization of Metamagnetic B2-ordered FeRh Epilayers
Published on: October 5, 2013
Distinguishing the Rhombohedral Phase from Orthorhombic Phases in Epitaxial Doped HfO2 Ferroelectric Films
Adrian Petraru1, Ole Gronenberg2, Ulrich Schürmann2,3
1Nanoelectronics, Institute of Electrical Engineering and Information Engineering, Kiel University, Kiel 24143, Germany.
Abstract:
Epitaxial strain plays an important role in the stabilization of ferroelectricity in doped hafnia thin films, which are emerging candidates for Si-compatible nanoscale devices. Here, we report on epitaxial ferroelectric thin films of doped HfO2 deposited on La0.7Sr0.3MnO3-buffered SrTiO3 substrates, La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 SrTiO3-buffered Si (100) wafers, and trigonal Al2O3 substrates. The investigated films appear to consist of four domains in a rhombohedral phase for films deposited on La0.7Sr0.3MnO3-buffered SrTiO3 substrates and two domains for those deposited on sapphire. These findings are supported by extensive transmission electron microscopy characterization of the investigated films. The doped hafnia films show ferroelectric behavior with a remanent polarization up to 25 μC/cm2 and they do not require wake-up cycling to reach the polarization, unlike the reported polycrystalline orthorhombic ferroelectric hafnia films.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

