Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
Changing the Culture to Improve CCF: An Improvement Project
Joshua Kimbrell1, Jacob Geldner1, Dheuris Rodriguez1
1Department of Pre-Hospital Care, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Queens, New York.
Improving chest compression fraction (CCF) in cardiac arrests is vital for survival. This study enhanced CCF through targeted interventions like clinician feedback and team leader designation, achieving significant performance gains.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Quality Improvement Science
Background:
- Chest Compression Fraction (CCF) is a critical process measure in cardiac arrest resuscitation, directly impacting patient survival rates.
- Improving CCF is a key objective for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agencies aiming to enhance patient outcomes.
- Baseline CCF in paramedic-attended medical cardiac arrests was identified as an area requiring significant improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To improve the monthly median CCF from a baseline of 81.5% to 90% or higher in paramedic-attended medical cardiac arrests.
- To implement and evaluate targeted interventions focused on paramedics within a large urban 9-1-1 system.
- To achieve measurable improvements in resuscitation performance through systematic quality improvement initiatives.
Main Methods:
- Utilized repeated Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, incorporating brainstorming, focus groups, and data review.
- Implemented interventions including standardized clinician feedback forms, enhanced follow-up for ongoing resuscitations, a dedicated CPR team leader, and pre-charged defibrillators.
- Evaluated intervention effectiveness through weekly/monthly CCF performance tabulation, participant feedback, and control chart analysis, adhering to SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines.
Main Results:
- Control chart analysis indicated special cause variation, leading to an increase in average CCF to 89.0%.
- Successful implementation of process changes via PDSA cycles drove the observed improvement in CCF.
- Clinician feedback forms were identified as the most effective and well-received intervention; other key contributors included patient-team reunification and pre-charging defibrillators.
Conclusions:
- Targeted education, consistent clinician feedback, patient-team reunification, and high-performance resuscitation strategies demonstrably improve CCF.
- The study highlights the effectiveness of systematic quality improvement approaches in enhancing critical care delivery.
- Achieving near-target CCF demonstrates the potential for significant gains in resuscitation quality within EMS systems.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
11:13Collection, Expansion, and Differentiation of Primary Human Nasal Epithelial Cell Models for Quantification of Cilia Beat Frequency
Published on: November 10, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Social Proof
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Critical Thinking II
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...