Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Molecular Differences With Therapeutic Implications in Early-Onset Compared With Average-Onset Biliary Tract Cancers
Thejus Jayakrishnan1,2, Yasmine Baca3, Joanne Xiu3
1Department of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Early-onset biliary tract cancer (eoBTC) shows distinct molecular features, including higher FGFR2 fusions, compared to average-onset BTC. These molecular differences, particularly FGFR2 fusion status, impact patient outcomes, highlighting the need for advanced genomic testing.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Cancer Biology
Background:
- Early-onset cancers, including biliary tract cancer (BTC), are a growing concern with limited understanding of their underlying biology.
- Distinguishing molecular characteristics between early-onset BTC (eoBTC) and average-onset BTC (aoBTC) is crucial for targeted therapies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify novel molecular differences between eoBTC and aoBTC using a comprehensive multiomics dataset.
- To investigate the impact of these molecular differences on patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 5,587 BTC patients (453 eoBTC, 5,134 aoBTC) with molecular profiling data.
- Comparison of molecular alterations, including gene fusions and immune scores, between eoBTC and aoBTC groups.
- Survival analysis using insurance claims data to correlate molecular features with overall survival (OS).
Main Results:
- Significantly higher prevalence of FGFR2 fusions (15.7% vs 5.9%) and NIPBL fusions (1.1% vs 0%) in eoBTC compared to aoBTC.
- eoBTC demonstrated enrichment in angiogenesis pathways, while aoBTC showed enrichment in interferon gamma and inflammatory response pathways.
- Overall survival was longer in eoBTC (16.5 months) versus aoBTC (13.3 months), with FGFR2 fusion status influencing outcomes in both groups.
Conclusions:
- Significant molecular disparities exist between eoBTC and aoBTC, notably the increased frequency of FGFR2 fusions in younger patients.
- FGFR2 fusion status is a key determinant of outcomes in eoBTC, underscoring its importance as a therapeutic target.
- The findings emphasize the critical need for widespread access to next-generation sequencing for early identification of actionable targets in BTC.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...

