Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Color Vision

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Task-specific effects of looming audio: Influences on visual contrast and orientation sensitivity.

Perception·2025

Same author

Do Patients With Candidemia Need an Ophthalmologic Examination?

Open forum infectious diseases·2024

Same author

Case report on a de novo variant in the X-linked <i>PRPS1</i> gene presenting with retinal dystrophy, severe tremors, and ataxia in a female patient.

Ophthalmic genetics·2024

Same author

The Logistical Backbone of Photoreceptor Cell Function: Complementary Mechanisms of Dietary Vitamin A Receptors and Rhodopsin Transporters.

International journal of molecular sciences·2024

Same author

The Clinical Findings, Pathogenic Variants, and Gene Therapy Qualifications Found in a Leber Congenital Amaurosis Phenotypic Spectrum Patient Cohort.

International journal of molecular sciences·2024

Same author

High-Throughput Binocular Pattern Electroretinograms in the Mouse.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)·2023

Same journal

Visual disability accommodations and ophthalmology.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Safety and efficacy of biosimilar aflibercept MYL-1701P in diabetic macular oedema: 20-week extension results following the INSIGHT pivotal trial.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Clinical efficacy of portable, cost-effective manual thermal pulsation for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction and factors associated with therapeutic efficacy.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Long-term axial elongation in myopic children wearing DIMS spectacle lenses: an 8-to-10-year observational study.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

A systematic review of neuroprotective therapies for visual acuity preservation in retinitis pigmentosa.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026

Same journal

Alternative posology for brolucizumab: a 6-week loading regimen is as effective as a 4-week regimen for the treatment of nAMD.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials in prosthetic vision and simulated visual reduction.

Yingchen He¹, Jonathon Toft-Nielsen^2,3, Gordon Legge⁴

¹Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA yhe29@ncsu.edu.

BMJ Open Ophthalmology

|August 5, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in Argus II retinal prosthesis users show similar patterns to sighted individuals. This objective method helps evaluate artificial vision therapy systems (AVTSs) for implant users.

Keywords:

Electrophysiology Prosthesis Visual pathway Visual perception

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Simultaneous Recording of Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Anesthetized Rats

Published on: July 1, 2016

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Ophthalmology
Biomedical Engineering

Background:

Prosthetic vision aims to restore sight using artificial vision therapy systems (AVTSs).
Evaluating the efficacy of these systems requires objective measures of visual processing.
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) offer a non-invasive method to assess visual pathway function.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantitatively assess visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in patients with the Argus II retinal prosthesis.
To compare VEPs in prosthetic vision with simulated visual reduction in sighted controls.
To determine the responsiveness of the early visual cortex to retinal input from a prosthesis.

Main Methods:

VEPs were recorded from four blind patients using the Argus II retinal prosthesis and seven sighted controls.
Pattern-reversal stimuli were used, with different presentation rates for patients and controls.
Controls experienced simulated visual reduction (blur, contrast reduction, field restriction).

Main Results:

VEPs in Argus II patients exhibited a similar waveform shape to normal VEPs.
Simulated visual reduction in controls showed that blur delayed P100 peak time, and reduced contrast decreased P100 amplitude.
Field restriction did not significantly impact P100 amplitude or latency.

Conclusions:

The early visual cortex remains responsive to retinal input in retinal prosthesis users.
Pattern-reversal VEPs provide objective insights for evaluating AVTSs and guiding user selection, fitting, and training.
Interpretation of VEP results requires consideration of electrode stimulation timing and location uncertainties.