Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.1K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.1K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

35
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
35
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

7.6K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.6K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

190
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
190
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

444
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
444
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.2K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bounds and E-values for Marginal Causal Effects.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Re: ratios in regression analyses with causal questions.

American journal of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Correction to "Propensity weighting plus adjustment in proportional hazards model is not doubly robust," by Erin E. Gabriel, Michael C. Sachs, Ingeborg Waernbaum, Els Goetghebeur, Paul F. Blanche, Stijn Vansteelandt, Arvid Sjölander, and Thomas Scheike; Volume 80, Issue 3, September 2024, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae069.

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Sensitivity analysis for the probability of benefit in randomized controlled trials with a binary treatment and a binary outcome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

A Generalization of the Mechanism-based Approach for Age-Period-Cohort Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Drug use and acute kidney injury: a Drug-Wide Association Study (DWAS) in Denmark and Sweden.

Clinical kidney journal·2025
Same journal

Design and procedures for the greenness, cognitive performance and vascular outcomes in the northern Manhattan study (NOMAS-greenness).

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Home dampness and molds and occurrence of respiratory tract infections in the first 27 years of life: the Espoo Cohort Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A SIMPLE AND POWERFUL TEST OF VACCINE WANING.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association Between maternal body mass index, offspring growth and pubertal timing: results from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Developing a novel algorithm to identify incident and prevalent dementia in Medicare claims-the ARIC Study.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

RE: advancing observational research on arts and health: theory-informed approaches using the RADIANCE framework.

American journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K

Bespoke instrumental variables with nonideal reference populations.

Arvid Sjölander1, Erin E Gabriel2

  • 1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Nobels väg 12A, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.

American Journal of Epidemiology
|August 5, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new instrumental variable method addresses unmeasured confounding in causal inference. It extends previous work to handle nonideal reference populations, improving causal effect estimation in complex studies.

Keywords:
causal inferenceconfoundinginstrumental variable

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.3K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Causal Inference

Background:

  • Unmeasured confounding poses a significant challenge in estimating causal effects.
  • Existing instrumental variable methods often rely on ideal reference populations.
  • Randomized trials with nonadherence present unique challenges for causal inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the bespoke instrumental variable method for nonideal reference populations.
  • To address bias in causal exposure effect estimation when the reference population is not entirely unexposed.
  • To enhance the applicability of instrumental variable methods in settings like randomized trials with nonadherence.

Main Methods:

  • Extension of the bespoke instrumental variable method.
  • Incorporation of data from a nonideal reference population (may include exposed individuals).
  • Scrutiny of the underlying assumptions of the instrumental variable method.

Main Results:

  • The extended method allows for causal inference with a nonideal reference population.
  • The approach is particularly relevant for randomized trials with treatment nonadherence.
  • Potential nonrobustness to assumptions is highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • The extended bespoke instrumental variable method offers a valuable tool for causal inference in challenging epidemiological settings.
  • Careful consideration of method assumptions is crucial for reliable causal effect estimation.
  • This work advances methods for handling unmeasured confounding in the presence of imperfect reference data.