Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Standardized Colon Ascendens Stent Peritonitis in Rats - a Simple, Feasible Animal Model to Induce Septic Acute Kidney Injury
Published on: February 15, 2022
Risk of Serious Adverse Gastrointestinal Events with Potassium Binders in Hospitalized Patients: A National Study
Jürgen L Holleck1,2, Ling Han3, Melissa Skanderson4
1Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. Jurgen.Holleck@yale.edu.
Background:
Concerns about serious adverse gastrointestinal (GI) events with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) led to development of two new potassium binders, patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC), for treatment of hyperkalemia.
Objective:
To compare risk of intestinal ischemia/thrombosis or other serious GI events associated with SPS, patiromer, or SZC in hospitalized patients.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Participants:
National sample of 3,144,960 veterans hospitalized 2016-2022 in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.
Main Measures:
Demographics, comorbidities, medications and outcomes were ascertained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Exposures were SPS, patiromer, SZC. Outcomes were 30-day intestinal ischemia/thrombosis, and a composite of intestinal ischemia/thrombosis, peptic ulcer/perforation or bowel resection/ostomy.
Key Results:
Potassium binders were used during 39,270 (1.3%) hospitalizations: SPS = 30,040 (1.0%), patiromer = 3,750 (0.1%), and SZC = 5,520 (0.2%). Intestinal ischemia/thrombosis occurred with 106/30,040 (0.4%) SPS, 12/3750 (0.3%) patiromer and 24/5520 (0.4%) SZC, vs. 6998/3,105,650 (0.2%) without potassium binder. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were 1.40 [95% CI, 1.16 to 1.69] with SPS, 1.36 [CI, 0.79 to 2.36] with patiromer, and 1.78 [CI, 1.21 to 2.63] with SZC exposures. Composite GI adverse events occurred with 754/30,040 (2.5%) SPS, 96/3750 (2.6%) patiromer, 2.6% SZC, vs. 144/5520 (2.4%) without binder; aOR were 1.00 [CI, 0.94 to 1.08] with SPS, 1.08 [CI, 0.89 to 1.32] with patiromer, and 1.08 [CI, 0.93 to 1.27] with SZC exposures. No statistical difference in intestinal ischemia/thrombosis between each new agent and SPS was seen (p = 0.274 for SPS vs. SZC; p = 0.916 for SPS vs. patiromer).
Conclusion:
Risk of intestinal ischemia/thrombosis or other serious adverse GI events was low and did not differ across three potassium-binding drugs.
Related Concept Videos
Antihypertensive Drugs: Potassium-Sparing Diuretics
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiepileptic Drugs: Potassium Channel Activators
Ezogabine has gained approval as an adjunctive treatment...
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

