Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Promoting equity in polygenic risk assessment through global collaboration.
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. kullo.iftikhar@mayo.edu.
Genomic technologies like polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve health but may worsen disparities. Global collaboration is crucial for equitable PRS development and implementation worldwide.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Global Health
- Bioethics
Background:
- Genomic technologies offer significant health benefits, including improved disease risk prediction.
- Delays in accessing these technologies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) raise scientific and ethical concerns.
- Current polygenic risk scores (PRSs) show limited portability across diverse populations, potentially exacerbating health inequities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the urgent need for global collaboration in developing and implementing polygenic risk scores (PRSs).
- To advocate for equitable PRS performance across diverse global populations.
- To address the challenges and requirements for achieving global equity in genomic medicine.
Main Methods:
- This perspective synthesizes current challenges and proposes a framework for equitable PRS development.
- It emphasizes the necessity of capacity building and data generation in low-resource settings.
- It calls for secure data sharing, advanced statistical methods, and ethical implementation strategies.
Main Results:
- Current PRS models exhibit performance disparities across different ancestral groups.
- The lack of diverse data limits the generalizability and clinical utility of PRSs globally.
- Addressing these limitations requires a concerted global effort involving multiple stakeholders.
Conclusions:
- Global collaboration is essential to ensure polygenic risk scores (PRSs) benefit all populations equitably.
- Capacity building, diverse data generation, and ethical considerations are critical for successful implementation.
- Policy and funding support are necessary to bridge the gap in genomic medicine access and application worldwide.
More Related Videos
08:27Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...