Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cellular responses to DNA damage.

G C Walker, L Marsh, L Dodson

    Environmental Health Perspectives
    |October 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The SOS network, crucial for DNA repair, is now understood thanks to genetic and molecular techniques. Key genes like umuD and umuC are essential for mutagenesis following DNA damage.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Outreach simulation for system improvement: a novel advocacy and reporting process.

    Advances in simulation (London, England)·2025
    Same author

    Fifth metatarsal fracture mapping and associated clinical outcomes.

    European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2025
    Same author

    Validation of a diagnostic support tool for early recognition of cervical arterial dissection in primary care.

    Clinical neurology and neurosurgery·2024
    Same author

    Experiences of UK and Irish family carers of people with profound and multiple intellectual disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    BMC public health·2023
    Same author

    Correction: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family carers of those with profound and multiple intellectual disabilities: perspectives from UK and Irish Non-Governmental Organisations.

    BMC public health·2022
    Same author

    Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family carers of those with profound and multiple intellectual disabilities: perspectives from UK and Irish Non-Governmental Organisations.

    BMC public health·2022
    Same journal

    A New Start.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Time-Varying Exposure to Element Mixtures and Children's Cognition at 5 Years of Age: Findings from the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effect of Household Air Pollution on the Gut Microbiome and Virome of Adult Women Living in Uganda.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Comparison of Temperature-Mortality Associations across the Middle East Using Different Exposure Estimation Approaches.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Workflow for Statistical Analysis of Environmental Mixtures.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    Same journal

    Effects of Extreme Heat Exposure on Heatstroke and Liver Injury in Mice: The Role of PPARα.

    Environmental health perspectives·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Microbiology
    • Molecular Biology
    • Genetics

    Background:

    • The SOS network's regulation was historically complex due to intricate responses and regulatory element interrelationships.
    • Recent advancements in genetic and molecular biology have clarified the SOS network's regulatory mechanisms.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To elucidate the detailed regulation of the bacterial SOS network.
    • To identify key genes and proteins involved in DNA damage response and mutagenesis.

    Main Methods:

    • Application of advanced genetic techniques.
    • Utilization of molecular biological methods for detailed analysis.
    • Gene and protein characterization (e.g., molecular weight determination).

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • The SOS network comprises over 17 genes, all repressed by the LexA protein.
    • RecA protein activation by DNA damage signals induces the SOS network genes.
    • umuD and umuC genes are essential for UV and carcinogen-induced mutagenesis, with mucA and mucB as analogs on plasmid pKM101.

    Conclusions:

    • The LexA and RecA proteins play central roles in regulating the SOS DNA damage response network.
    • The umuD/umuC operon is critical for bacterial mutagenesis, a process mimicked by mucA/mucB on pKM101.