Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026
Utility of Dissociated Intrinsic Hand Muscle Atrophy in the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published on: March 4, 2014
Electrodiagnosis for mitigating false-negative non-responsiveness in electrical evoked contractions: A case series
Bruno Flamarion-Dos-Santos1, David Lobato Borges1, Henrique Resende Martins2
1Faculdade de Ceilândia (FCE), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação (PPGCR) and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde (PPGCTS), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia, Brazil.
Introduction:
The revised international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (ISNCSCI) have facilitated the documentation of non-spinal cord injury-related impairments, such as chronic peripheral nerve injuries and muscle weakness due to immobility. This advancement addresses potential biases in muscle strength examinations. Utilizing electrically evoked contractions from paralyzed muscles, enhanced by electrodiagnosis, holds promise in identifying false-negative diagnoses of non-responsiveness to neuromuscular electrical stimulation. This concept prompts the exploration of polyneuromyopathy arising from nonuse in paralyzed muscles.
Case Series Presentation:
To substantiate our hypothesis, we recruited nine participants for a case series aimed at elucidating the potential benefits of incorporating the stimulus electrodiagnostic test (SET) to mitigate non-responsiveness during preparation for functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted cycling. In our convenience sample (n = 5), we conducted neurological mapping based on ISNCSCI and applied SET on the quadriceps. The SET guided optimal dosimetry for evoking contractions and revealed responses similar to those observed in peripheral neuropathies, with α coefficients equal to or lower than 2.00. This observation is likely attributable to nonuse of paralyzed muscles, indicative of an ongoing polyneuropathy in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).
Discussion:
Among the nine initially recruited subjects, seven exhibited responsiveness to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (78% responsiveness), with two participants excluded based on exclusion criteria. In the final five reported cases, all displayed α coefficient values indicating impaired neuromuscular accommodation, and one presented no α coefficient within the normal range. The inclusion of electrodiagnosis appears effective in averting non-responsiveness, suggesting the presence of ongoing polyneuropathies in paralyzed muscles.
