Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

10:15
Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
17.8K
rTMS for Poststroke Pusher Syndrome: A Randomized, Patient-Blinded Controlled Clinical Trial
Lijiao Meng1,2, Yanlei Ge1,2, Raymond C C Tsang3
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
|August 6, 2024
Summary
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) did not significantly improve pushing behavior or mobility in poststroke pusher syndrome (PS) patients. However, rTMS showed a potential positive effect on enhancing motor function recovery in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Poststroke pusher syndrome (PS) presents significant challenges in rehabilitation and post-discharge care.
- Effective treatments for PS are limited, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic approaches.
- The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for PS has not been previously investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of rTMS in treating poststroke PS.
- To assess rTMS's impact on reducing pushing behavior.
- To determine if rTMS can enhance motor recovery and improve mobility in PS patients.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled trial was conducted.
- Thirty-four patients with poststroke PS received either rTMS or sham rTMS for two weeks.
- Outcomes including pushing behavior, motor function (Fugl-Meyer assessment scale-motor domain), and mobility were assessed at baseline and at one and two weeks post-intervention.
Main Results:
- No significant improvements were observed in pushing behavior (Burke lateropulsion scale, scale for contraversive pushing) or mobility (modified Rivermead mobility index) between the rTMS and sham groups.
- A statistically significant interaction between intervention and time was found for motor function (FMA-m).
- The rTMS group demonstrated better improvement in FMA-m scores at one and two weeks post-treatment compared to the sham group.
Conclusions:
- rTMS did not prove effective in reducing pushing behavior or enhancing mobility in patients with poststroke PS.
- rTMS may hold potential for improving motor function in patients suffering from PS.
- Further research is warranted to explore the specific effects of rTMS on motor recovery in PS.

