Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Barriers to Optimal Clinician Guideline Adherence in Management of Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: A Qualitative
Yuan Lu1,2, Oreoluwa Arowojolu1, Xiaoliang Qiu3
1Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Insights
Clinician adherence to hypertension guidelines is suboptimal. This study identified clinician, patient, and clinical factors contributing to non-adherence in severe hypertension cases, paving the way for targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Hypertension is a significant public health concern.
- Despite established clinical guidelines, suboptimal clinician adherence to hypertension management protocols persists.
- Understanding barriers to guideline adherence is crucial for improving patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a taxonomy of suboptimal adherence scenarios in severe hypertension management.
- To identify specific barriers contributing to clinician nonadherence to hypertension guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative content analysis of electronic health records (EHRs) from Yale New Haven Health System.
- Inclusion of patients with at least two consecutive high blood pressure readings and no recent antihypertensive prescriptions.
- Thematic analysis of EHR data to categorize adherence scenarios and influencing factors.
Main Results:
- A taxonomy of suboptimal adherence was developed, encompassing clinician-related, patient-related, and clinical complexity-related scenarios.
- Clinician-related factors included intention, capability, scope, and diffusion of responsibility.
- Patient-related factors involved nonadherence and preferences, while clinical complexity included diagnostic uncertainty and competing priorities.
Conclusions:
- A pragmatic taxonomy of suboptimal adherence scenarios for severe hypertension was established.
- Identified barriers provide a foundation for developing targeted interventions to enhance clinician guideline adherence.
- Improving adherence is essential for better hypertension management and patient health outcomes.
Importance:
Hypertension poses a substantial public health challenge. Despite clinical practice guidelines for hypertension management, clinician adherence to these guidelines remains suboptimal.
Objective:
To develop a taxonomy of suboptimal adherence scenarios for severe hypertension and identify barriers to guideline adherence.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This qualitative content analysis using electronic health records (EHRs) of Yale New Haven Health System included participants who had at least 2 consecutive visits with markedly elevated blood pressure (BP; defined as at least 2 consecutive readings of systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥100 mm Hg) between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2021, and no prescription for antihypertensive medication within a 90 days of the second BP measurement. Data analysis was conducted from January to December 2023.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was scenarios and influencing factors contributing to clinician nonadherence to the guidelines for hypertension management. A thematic analysis of EHR data was conducted to generate a pragmatic taxonomy of scenarios of suboptimal clinician guideline adherence in the management of severe hypertension.
Results:
Of the 20 654 patients who met criteria, 200 were randomly selected and thematic saturation was reached after analyzing 100 patients (mean [SD] age at index visit, 66.5 [12.8] years; 50 female [50%]; 8 Black [8%]; 5 Hispanic or Latino [5%]; 85 White [85%]). Three content domains emerged: (1) clinician-related scenarios (defined as noninitiation or nonintensification of treatment due to issues relating to clinician intention, capability, or scope), which included 2 subcategories (did not address and diffusion of responsibility); (2) patient-related scenarios (defined as noninitiation or nonintensification of treatment due to patient behavioral considerations), which included 2 subcategories (patient nonadherence and patient preference); and (3) clinical complexity-related scenarios (defined as noninitiation or nonintensification of treatment due to clinical situational complexities), which included 3 subcategories (diagnostic uncertainty, maintenance of current intervention, and competing medical priorities).
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this qualitative study of EHR data, a taxonomy of suboptimal adherence scenarios for severe hypertension was developed and barriers to guideline adherence were identified. This pragmatic taxonomy lays the foundation for developing targeted interventions to improve clinician adherence to guidelines and patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors:

