Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025
Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013
The triggers of situational syncope do not influence the head-up tilt test response and prognosis
Vincenzo Russo1, Erika Parente1, Angelo Comune1
1Cardiology and Syncope Unit, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'-Monaldi Hospital, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Aims:
The study evaluated the positivity rate, haemodynamic responses, and prognosis in terms of syncopal recurrence among patients with situational syncope (SS) stratified according to the underlying situational triggers.
Methods And Results:
We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients with SS who underwent nitroglycerine (NTG)-potentiated head-up tilt test (HUTT) at Syncope Unit of the University of Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli'-Monaldi Hospital from 1 March 2017 to 1 May 2023. All patients were followed for at least one year. The study population was divided according to the underlying triggers (micturition, swallow, defaecation, cough/sneeze, post-exercise). Two hundred thirty-six SS patients (mean age 50 ± 19.3 years; male 63.1%) were enrolled; among them, the situational trigger was micturition in 109 patients (46.2%); swallow in 32 (13.6%) patients; defaecation in 35 (14.8%) patients; post-exercise in 41 (17.4%) patients; and cough/sneeze in 17 (7.2%) patients. There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics and HUTT responses between different situational triggers. The Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a statistically different rate of syncope recurrence across patients stratified by baseline situational triggers (log-rank P = 0.21).
Conclusion:
Situational syncope appears to be a homogenous syndrome, and different triggers do not impact the HUTT response or syncope recurrence at 1 year.
