Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Robotic Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: May 29, 2015
Randomized Study Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation with the PVAC Gold System vs. Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Elderly
Luiz Claudio Berhmann Martins1, Cristiano F Pisani1, Fabio K Dorfman1
1Unidade de Arritmia, Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP - Brasil.
Catheter ablation (CA) and antiarrhythmic drugs (AA) both improve quality of life for elderly patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, CA showed a higher, though not statistically significant, recurrence-free rate than AA treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Limited randomized studies exist comparing catheter ablation (CA) versus antiarrhythmic drugs (AA) for maintaining sinus rhythm in elderly patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Elderly patients with paroxysmal AF refractory to at least one AA, and without structural heart disease, represent a population with unmet needs for effective rhythm control strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using the second-generation PVAC Gold catheter against AA treatment in elderly individuals with recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF.
- To assess the AF recurrence-free rate, progression to persistent AF, quality of life (QOLF), and complication rates between CA and AA treatment groups.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving sixty patients aged 65 years or older with paroxysmal AF.
- Patients were randomized into two groups: Group 1 underwent CA (PV isolation), and Group 2 received AA drugs.
- The primary outcome was the AF recurrence-free rate at one-year follow-up, with secondary outcomes including AF progression, QOLF, and complications.
Main Results:
- The AF recurrence-free rate was 80% in the CA group versus 65% in the AA group (p=0.119) after an average follow-up of 719 days.
- The persistent AF-free rate was 83.4% for CA and 67.7% for AA (p=0.073).
- Both groups showed improved QOLF (p<0.001), with no significant difference between them. Notably, 25% of CA patients exhibited cerebral embolization signs on MRI, without clinical repercussions.
Conclusions:
- Both catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drug strategies effectively improve quality of life in elderly patients with symptomatic AF.
- While CA demonstrated a trend towards better recurrence-free rates, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes compared to AA treatment.
- Further research with advanced technologies focusing on safety profiles is warranted to fully elucidate the benefits of CA in this elderly population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias

