Bayesian spatial analysis of incomplete vaccination among children aged 12-23 months in Nigeria

Lanre Quadri Ahmed1, Ayo S Adebowale2,3, Martin E Palamuleni3

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. quadriahmed2016@gmail.com.

Scientific Reports
|August 7, 2024
PubMed

Insights

In Nigeria, incomplete childhood vaccination remains high, particularly in northern regions. Maternal age, education, health facility delivery, and media exposure significantly influence vaccination status.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Nigeria faces significant challenges with high childhood disease prevalence and under-five mortality rates.
  • Vaccination is a critical, cost-effective intervention for preventing childhood diseases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the key determinants of incomplete vaccination (IV) among children aged 12-23 months in Nigeria.
  • To analyze the influence of maternal and community-level factors on childhood vaccination status.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) dataset with a cross-sectional design.
  • Employed Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation and Bayesian binary regression models for data analysis.
  • Visualized incomplete vaccination patterns using ArcGIS software.

Main Results:

  • The study found a high prevalence of incomplete vaccination (IV) in Nigeria, with northern regions showing higher rates.
  • Maternal age (older mothers less likely to have IV), higher education, delivery at a health facility, and media exposure were associated with reduced odds of IV.
  • Maternal characteristics were the primary drivers of IV variability, outweighing community and state-level factors.

Conclusions:

  • Significant regional and socioeconomic disparities in childhood vaccination exist in Nigeria.
  • Targeted interventions focusing on maternal education and access to healthcare facilities are crucial.
  • Enhanced vaccination sensitization programs and campaigns are necessary to improve coverage and reduce childhood disease burden.

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
337
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
190
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
354
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
7.6K
Vaccinations01:51

Vaccinations

Overview
44.2K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
155