Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Glaucoma-inducing Procedure in an In Vivo Rat Model and Whole-mount Retina Preparation
Published on: March 12, 2016
Comparison of Different Doses of Oral and Ocular Propranolol for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Network Meta-Analysis
Amparo Ortiz-Seller1, Pablo Martorell2, Patricia Roselló3,4
1Unit of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Oftalvist Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Insights
Propranolol effectively reduces retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) progression, especially at later stages. While eye micro-drops show comparable efficacy to oral propranolol, safety concerns warrant careful consideration of dosage.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neonatology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a significant cause of visual impairment in premature infants.
- The optimal treatment strategy for ROP, including the role and dosage of propranolol, remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a ranking of different propranolol doses for ROP treatment.
- To evaluate propranolol's efficacy in preventing ROP stage progression, plus disease, and the need for anti-VEGF or laser therapy.
Main Methods:
- A network meta-analysis (NMA) of 14 studies (474 patients) involving oral or ocular propranolol.
- Bayesian analysis and model-based NMA were used to assess dose-response relationships and efficacy.
Main Results:
- Propranolol demonstrated improved efficacy when administered at later ROP stages (2-3) compared to earlier stages (0-1).
- Oral propranolol (1.5-2 mg/kg/day) and ocular propranolol (0.2%) showed the highest probability of efficacy at later stages.
- Lower doses of oral propranolol (0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day) also retained efficacy, with varying risk profiles for adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Propranolol reduces ROP progression and the need for additional treatments, but safety is a concern, particularly at higher oral doses.
- Ocular propranolol (0.2%) may be as effective as oral propranolol.
- Limited study quality and quantity necessitate cautious interpretation of findings.
Objective:
The efficacy and safety of propranolol for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) remain under debate. This network meta-analysis (NMA) focuses on whether a ranking may be established for different dose levels of propranolol as treatment of ROP in terms of stage progression as the primary outcome, with appearance of plus disease and need for anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs) or laser therapy as secondary endpoints.
Methods:
Fourteen studies (10 randomised controlled trials, three single-arm trials and one retrospective observational study) of 474 patients treated with oral or ocular propranolol were retrieved from databases up to April 2024. Meta-insight and model-based NMA were undertaken to evaluate the propranolol dose-response relationship. Studies were evaluated for model fit, risk of bias and Confidence of evidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). Effect sizes were determined as odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI).
Results:
Bayesian analysis showed a trend towards improved effects for propranolol given at late stages (stages 2-3; S23) of ROP progression compared with its administration at earlier stages (stages 0-1; S01). OR values for oral propranolol 1.5 and 2 mg/kg/day given at S23 were 0.13 (95% CrI 0.04-0.37) and 0.16 (95% CrI 0.04-0.61), respectively, while given at S01 were 0.28 (95% CrI 0.02-2.96) and 0.78 (95% CrI 0.14-4.43), respectively. Similarly, OR of eye propranolol 0.2% at S23 was 0.37 (95% CrI 0.09-1.00) versus an S01 OR of 0.64 (95% CrI 0.21-2.04). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analyses confirmed best probability values for oral propranolol 1.5-2 mg/kg followed by eye propranolol 0.2%, all at S23. Model-based NMA showed nonlinearity in the dose-response for oral propranolol with a trend to greater maximal effect for its administration at late versus early stages. For secondary endpoints, lower risk values were found with oral propranolol 1.5 mg/kg/day at S23 for progression to plus disease (OR 0.14; 95% CrI 0.02-0.84) and need for anti-VEGFs (OR 0.23; 95% CrI 0.05-0.93) and laser (OR 0.16; 95% CrI 0.02-1.10) therapies also followed by eye propranolol 0.2%, and a similar profile was obtained with SUCRA analysis. Lower doses (0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day) of oral propranolol retained efficacy. Threat of adverse events was estimated as risk difference versus control with no difference for eye propranolol 0.2% and oral propranolol 0.5 mg/kg/day, modest increases of risk for oral propranolol 1.0 and 1.5 mg/kg/day and the highest risk difference for oral propranolol 2.0 mg/kg/day (0.06; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.13).
Conclusion:
A diminished risk of disease progression and need for additional treatment was obtained with propranolol in ROP, but safety is a potential concern. Propranolol eye micro-drops (0.2%) can be as efficacious as oral propranolol. Nonetheless, the evidence is limited due to the paucity and quality of the available studies.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers

