Contemporary Immunosuppression Management and 1-Year Outcomes in Dual Organ Heart Transplantation

Xinyi Huang1,2, David Salerno1, Danielle Kovac1

  • 1Department of Pharmacy, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.

PubMed

Insights

This study examined immunosuppression strategies and outcomes for dual organ heart transplant recipients. Heart-kidney recipients showed lower 1-year survival compared to heart-lung and heart-liver patients.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Immunology
  • Nephrology
  • Hepatology
  • Pulmonology

Background:

  • Limited data exists on immunosuppression and outcomes for dual organ heart transplant recipients, especially post-2018 allocation policy changes.
  • Recent findings suggest comparable outcomes for heart-lung and heart-liver transplants, but worse survival for heart-kidney recipients.
  • Understanding these outcomes is crucial for optimizing patient care and management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate immunosuppression strategies and clinical outcomes in adult heart-kidney, heart-liver, and heart-lung transplant recipients.
  • To analyze infectious complications and graft outcomes within the first 12 months post-transplant.
  • To provide insights into the real-world effectiveness of current immunosuppression protocols.

Main Methods:

  • A single-center retrospective study included 36 adult dual organ heart transplant recipients (kidney, liver, lung) from September 2019 to May 2023.
  • Data collected included immunosuppression regimens, infectious complications, and graft outcomes over a 12-month period.
  • Statistical analysis focused on comparing outcomes across different dual organ transplant groups.

Main Results:

  • Basiliximab was the most common induction agent across all groups.
  • Triple immunosuppression was standard at 12 months, with one heart-liver recipient achieving prednisone wean.
  • Infection complications were high (95% kidney, 75% liver, 100% lung).
  • One-year survival rates were 85% for heart-kidney, 78% for heart-liver, and 86% for heart-lung recipients.
  • Graft outcomes included one case of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis leading to dialysis and one chronic lung allograft dysfunction; no severe rejection or retransplants were noted.

Conclusions:

  • This study provides a summary of real-world immunosuppression strategies and outcomes in dual organ heart transplant recipients.
  • Heart-kidney transplant recipients experienced lower 1-year survival rates compared to heart-lung and heart-liver recipients.
  • Further research is warranted to optimize immunosuppression and improve outcomes for these complex patient populations.
Abstract