Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Liv Stubbe Østergaard1, Signe Groth Andersson2

  • 1Steno Diabetes Center Sjælland.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|August 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Organizational user involvement in health and social care often favors resourceful individuals, potentially worsening health disparities. This review explores the reasons for this bias and suggests methods for more inclusive user engagement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality of diabetes care among persons with intellectual disabilities and type 2 diabetes: A nationwide cohort study.

Primary care diabetes·2026
Same author

Prevalence of torture and trauma history among immigrants in primary care in Denmark: do general practitioners ask?

European journal of public health·2020
Same author

Health examinations of child migrants in Europe: screening or assessment of healthcare needs?

BMJ paediatrics open·2019
Same author

Restricted health care entitlements for child migrants in Europe and Australia.

European journal of public health·2017
Same author

Health policies for migrant children in Europe and Australia.

Lancet (London, England)·2017

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Social Care Policy
  • Healthcare Management

Background:

  • Person-centered care and user involvement are increasingly prioritized in public welfare and health sectors.
  • Existing organizational user involvement practices show a bias towards resourceful citizens.
  • This bias risks exacerbating existing disparities in health and social care outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the underlying reasons for bias in organizational user involvement.
  • To identify and provide examples of strategies for creating more inclusive user involvement.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of studies on user involvement in health and social care organizations.
  • Analysis of factors contributing to bias in user engagement.
  • Synthesis of best practices for inclusive user involvement.

Main Results:

  • Identified factors contributing to bias include differing levels of social capital, digital literacy, and access to information among citizens.
  • Resourceful individuals are more likely to participate effectively in user involvement processes.
  • Lack of tailored support and accessible formats hinders participation for less resourceful groups.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing the bias in organizational user involvement is crucial for equitable health and social care.
  • Implementing inclusive strategies is necessary to ensure diverse voices are heard and valued.
  • Further research should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of different inclusive involvement methods.

Related Experiment Videos