Heparin pretreatment in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gonçalo Costa1,2, Bernardo Resende1, Bárbara Oliveiros2,3
1Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra.
Insights
Pretreating ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with unfractionated heparin (UFH) before percutaneous coronary intervention reduces mortality and cardiogenic shock. This strategy also enhances reperfusion and decreases major bleeding events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is commonly used before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.
- Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for UFH pretreatment prior to catheterization lab arrival.
Conclusions:
- UFH pretreatment in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI is linked to reduced all-cause mortality and cardiogenic shock.
- The strategy improves reperfusion rates and appears to diminish major bleeding complications.
- Findings support the consideration of UFH pretreatment in STEMI patients awaiting primary PCI.
Background:
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is frequently administered before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Current guidelines, however, do not provide clear recommendations for UFH pretreatment before arrival at the coronary catheterization laboratory.
Methods:
Between June and July 2023, we systematically searched PubMed , Embase , and Cochrane databases for studies comparing UFH pretreatments in patients with STEMI. A random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were performed.
Results:
Fourteen studies were included, of which four were randomized clinical trials. A total of 76 446 patients were included: 31 238 in the pretreatment group and 39 208 in the control group. Our meta-analysis revealed lower all-cause mortality for the pretreatment strategy when compared with the control group, albeit with high heterogeneity [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.76, P < 0.01; I2 = 77%]; lower in-hospital cardiogenic shock (pooled OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.78, P < 0.21; I2 = 27%) and a higher rate of spontaneous reperfusion events (pooled OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.91, P < 0.01; I2 = 79%). In terms of major bleeding, the UFH pretreatment strategy further revealed a decreased rate of events (pooled OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73-0.99, P = 0.40; I2 = 4%).
Conclusion:
Our study suggests that UFH pretreatment in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, enhancing reperfusion rates while diminishing major bleeding events.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...


