Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Impact of Procedural Success Definitions on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis Treated
Premanan Manoret1, Tasalak Thonghong2, Krissada Meemook3
1Cardiology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Prince of Songkla University Songkhla Thailand.
Insights
Choosing the right success definition for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) impacts patient outcomes. A specific definition combining mitral valve area and mitral regurgitation grades offers the most favorable long-term results.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- Uncertainty exists regarding optimal success definitions for percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV).
- Lack of comparative studies hinders the selection of appropriate PBMV success criteria.
- This study investigates the prognostic impact of different PBMV success definitions on long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between three distinct PBMV success definitions and long-term clinical outcomes.
- To identify the most prognostically significant success criteria for PBMV in rheumatic mitral stenosis.
- To guide the selection of standardized PBMV success metrics.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter retrospective study of severe rheumatic mitral stenosis patients undergoing PBMV.
- Evaluation of three success definitions based on post-PBMV mitral valve area (MVA) and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity.
- Multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess the composite outcome of mortality, mitral surgery, and repeat PBMV.
Main Results:
- All three evaluated PBMV success definitions were associated with a reduced risk of adverse composite outcomes.
- Hazard ratios for the composite outcome were consistent across definitions A, B, and C (HR 0.55).
- Patients meeting all three success criteria demonstrated the lowest risk of adverse outcomes compared to those meeting fewer criteria.
Conclusions:
- All three PBMV success definitions demonstrate prognostic value.
- A definition incorporating post-PBMV MVA ≥1.5 cm², regardless of percentage increase, and MR ≤ grade 2 with no more than a 1-grade increment is associated with the most favorable outcomes.
- Standardizing PBMV success definitions is crucial for consistent patient management and outcome prediction.
Background:
It is uncertain which percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) success definitions should be used because there are no studies comparing the effects of these definitions on subsequent outcomes. We evaluated the association between 3 success definitions and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis who underwent PBMV.
Methods And Results:
This multicenter retrospective study included patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis who underwent PBMV. Three definitions were used as follows: (A) post-PBMV mitral valve area (MVA) ≥1.5 cm2 or ≥50% increase in MVA with MR <3+; (B) post-PBMV MVA ≥1.5 cm2 and MR ≤2+; and (C) post-PBMV MVA ≥1.5 cm2 or ≥50% increase in MVA, with no more than 1-grade increment in MR. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between PBMV success and the composite of all-cause mortality, mitral surgery, and repeat PBMV. Successful PBMV, according to definitions A, B, and C was associated with a lower risk of the composite outcomes (definition A-hazard ratio [HR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43-0.69], definition B-HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.43-0.69], definition C-HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.69]). Patients meeting all 3 success definitions had the lowest risk compared with those who did not meet any definition or met 1 or 2 definitions.
Conclusions:
All 3 success definitions had a prognostic impact on outcomes. Patients who achieved post-PBMV MVA ≥1.5 cm2, irrespective of the percentage increase in MVA, and MR ≤grade 2, with no more than a 1-grade increment in MR, had the most favorable outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

