Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
Published on: January 6, 2023
Dependable Automated Approach for Measuring the Retrograde Superior Ramus Screw Corridor in Pelvic Fracture Fixation
Jing-Xin Zhao1,2, Hua Chen1,2, Mingjie Dong3
1Department of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
An automated method precisely measures the retrograde superior ramus screw (SRS) corridor, offering greater reliability and larger screw placement options than manual techniques. This advanced approach identifies significant diameter differences between sexes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Medical imaging analysis
- Surgical planning
Background:
- Accurate percutaneous placement of retrograde superior ramus screws (SRS) requires precise measurement of the intraosseous corridor.
- Conventional manual measurement methods for this corridor are subjective and lead to observer variability.
- A need exists for an automated and dependable method to determine the retrograde SRS corridor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an automated, computed tomography (CT) image-based algorithm for identifying the retrograde SRS corridor with maximum diameter.
- To compare the reliability and accuracy of the automated method against conventional manual measurements.
- To assess screw applicability and influencing factors (sex, age, height, weight) on corridor dimensions.
Main Methods:
- An automated CT image-based search algorithm was developed to find the maximum diameter retrograde SRS corridor.
- The automated method was compared to a manual method in 17 pelves for reliability assessment.
- Both methods measured corridor diameter, length, and orientation in 204 pelves (Chinese population), assessing intra- and interobserver agreement using RMSE and Bland-Altman plots.
Main Results:
- The automated method demonstrated superior intra- and interobserver reliability (ICC: 0.998, 0.995) compared to the manual method (ICC: 0.925, 0.918) for corridor diameter.
- The automated method identified a significantly larger corridor diameter (mean difference: 0.9 mm, RMSE: 1.1 mm) than the manual method.
- Females exhibited a smaller corridor diameter (7.5 mm) than males (10.4 mm), with female sex being the most significant factor (β = -0.583); automated method improved screw applicability for females.
Conclusions:
- The automated method offers enhanced reliability and identifies a larger retrograde SRS corridor for screw placement compared to manual methods.
- Significant sex-based differences in corridor diameter were observed, with females having smaller corridors.
- Current automated approach requires further development into integrated, user-friendly software for clinical traumatologist application.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
12:25C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Published on: September 16, 2022