Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

07:51
Measurements of Soil Carbon by Neutron-Gamma Analysis in Static and Scanning Modes
Published on: August 24, 2017
7.3K
First Simultaneous Measurement of Differential Muon-Neutrino Charged-Current Cross Sections on Argon for Final States
P Abratenko1, O Alterkait1, D Andrade Aldana2
1Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
Physical Review Letters
|August 9, 2024
Summary
This study presents the first double-differential neutrino-argon cross section measurement for muon neutrino charged-current interactions. Results reveal significant mismodeling in event generator predictions for final states without protons.
Area of Science:
- Particle Physics
- Nuclear Physics
- Experimental Physics
Background:
- Neutrino cross-section measurements are crucial for understanding neutrino interactions.
- Accurate modeling of neutrino interactions is essential for interpreting data from neutrino oscillation experiments.
- Previous measurements have had limitations in precisely characterizing final states, particularly those involving protons.
Purpose of the Study:
- To perform the first double-differential measurement of the neutrino-argon cross section for inclusive muon neutrino charged-current interactions.
- To investigate the proton kinematics in these interactions with a differential cross section measurement.
- To validate and improve neutrino interaction models used in experimental analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the MicroBooNE detector with 6.4×10^{20} protons on target.
- Measured cross sections for final states with and without protons.
- Employed data-driven model validation using conditional constraint formalism and empirical reweighting.
- Analyzed neutrino interactions from the Fermilab booster neutrino beam with a mean energy of ~0.8 GeV.
Main Results:
- Reported the first double-differential neutrino-argon cross section for muon neutrino charged-current interactions.
- Observed significant discrepancies between measured cross sections and predictions from widely used event generators for final states without protons.
- Demonstrated potential mismodeling in event generators, possibly due to inadequate treatment of final state interactions.
Conclusions:
- The measurements provide critical new data for refining neutrino interaction models.
- Improved event generators will enhance the precision of future neutrino physics measurements.
- The findings highlight the need for better simulation of final state interactions in neutrino event generators.
Related Concept Videos
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
582
The quadrupole mass analyzer consists of four cylindrical metal rods arranged in a diamond carrying a DC voltage and a radio-frequency AC voltage. The motion of ions through the quadrupole depends on the field strength, causing only ions of a certain m/z to resonate successfully and strike the detector at a given field strength. Though the transmission rate for these analyzers is high, the exact elemental composition of the sample is not determined because of low resolution; however, they are...
582
Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE)
647
Irradiation of a spin-active nucleus causes an increase or decrease in the signal intensity of neighboring nuclei that are not necessarily chemically bonded or involved in J-coupling. This phenomenon, called the Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE), results from through-space interactions between the nuclear spins. The NOE effect decreases with increasing internuclear distance and is generally not observed beyond 4 angstroms. In NOE, dipole-dipole interactions between neighboring...
647
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
354
The instrumentation of atomic emission spectrometry (AES) involves various components, including atomization devices that convert samples into gas-phase atoms and ions. There are two main types of atomization devices: continuous and discrete atomizers. Continuous atomizers, like plasmas and flames, introduce samples in a constant stream, while discrete atomizers inject individual samples using syringes or autosamplers. The most common discrete atomizer is the electrothermal atomizer.
354

