Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy01:29

Modern Molecular Taxonomy

Advancements in molecular biology have revolutionized the identification and characterization of bacteria, with multiple methods leveraging DNA sequencing for enhanced precision. As sequencing technologies improve and costs decline, these approaches are increasingly used in clinical, environmental, and evolutionary studies.Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) examines several housekeeping genes, essential chromosomal genes encoding cellular functions, to distinguish strains. Approximately...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adherence to international pharmacogenomic recommendations in pediatric cancer care: a cohort analysis embedded within the MARVEL-PIC randomized trial.

Pharmacogenomics·2026
Same author

Australian parents' perspectives on extended genomic screening: what information to return and when?

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026
Same author

How parents decide whether to have genomic newborn screening: experiences from BabyScreen.

European journal of human genetics : EJHG·2026
Same author

Automated reanalysis of genomic data for rare disease diagnostics at scale.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Tacrolimus in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Pediatric transplantation·2026
Same author

Unraveling a Diagnostic Enigma: A TECPR2 Case Solved Through Multi-Omic Genomics.

American journal of medical genetics. Part A·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
13:24

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies

Published on: April 11, 2016

11.8K

Benchmarking pharmacogenomics genotyping tools: Performance analysis on short-read sequencing samples and

Andreas Halman1,2,3, Sebastian Lunke2, Simon Sadedin2,4

  • 1Cancer Therapies, Stem Cell Medicine, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Clinical and Translational Science
|August 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Accurate pharmacogenomics (PGx) genotyping requires careful tool and reference genome selection. Specific tools like Cyrius excel for complex genes (CYP2D6), while lower sequencing depths impact accuracy.

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets
06:40

Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
13:24

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies

Published on: April 11, 2016

11.8K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.1K
Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets
06:40

Author Spotlight: Cost-Effective Transcriptomic Drug Screening - Unlocking New Targets

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics and Bioinformatics
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is crucial for personalized medicine, linking genetic variations to drug responses.
  • Accurate genotyping is essential for effective PGx implementation.
  • Evaluating computational tools and methodologies is vital for reliable PGx data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy of genotyping six genes using whole genome sequencing.
  • To compare the performance of four computational tools under various conditions.
  • To investigate the impact of sequencing depth, reference genomes, and aligners on genotyping accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Whole genome sequencing of samples.
  • Genotyping of six key pharmacogenomic genes using four distinct computational tools.
  • Analysis of varying sequencing depths (e.g., 5×, 20×, higher).
  • Evaluation of different reference genomes (GRCh38, GRCh37) and sequence aligners (BWA-MEM, Bowtie2).

Main Results:

  • Most tools showed minor performance variations across genes, except for the complex CYP2D6 gene.
  • Cyrius demonstrated superior performance for CYP2D6 genotyping.
  • Lower sequencing depths (especially 5×) led to decreased genotyping accuracy.
  • Choice of reference genome and aligner significantly impacted CYP2D6 results, causing incorrect star allele reporting.

Conclusions:

  • Tool selection and methodology are critical for accurate pharmacogenomic genotyping.
  • A consensus approach using multiple tools may enhance reliability, particularly at lower sequencing depths.
  • Upstream alignment choices significantly influence downstream genotyping tool performance.
  • Optimized PGx analysis requires careful consideration of computational tools, reference genomes, aligners, and sequencing depth.