Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

10:42
Infrared Degenerate Four-wave Mixing with Upconversion Detection for Quantitative Gas Sensing
Published on: March 22, 2019
6.2K
Laser-Induced Interference to Infrared Detector Using Continuous Wave and Short-Pulse Lasers.
Yingjie Ma1, Weijing Zhou1, Hao Chang1
1Department of Aerospace and Technology, Space Engineering University, Beijing 101416, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 10, 2024
Summary
Continuous wave (CW) lasers cause significant amplitude reduction and temporary blindness in PbS infrared detectors, while pulsed lasers induce transient interference. CW laser interference dominates at higher power densities, impacting detector performance.
Area of Science:
- Optoelectronics
- Laser-Material Interactions
- Infrared Detection Technology
Background:
- Lead sulfide (PbS) infrared detectors are crucial for various applications.
- Understanding laser-induced interference is vital for reliable detector operation.
- Previous studies have not fully characterized the distinct interference mechanisms of pulsed vs. CW lasers on PbS detectors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and differentiate the laser-induced interference effects of nanosecond pulsed and continuous wave (CW) lasers on a PbS infrared detector.
- To analyze the characteristics of transient and continuous interference signals.
- To determine the interference threshold for PbS detectors under laser irradiation.
Main Methods:
- Constructed a laser interference experiment system to measure time-varying response signals.
- Utilized a 1064 nm nanosecond pulsed laser and a 10 Hz CW laser with millimeter-scale spot diameter.
- Analyzed transient interference from pulsed lasers and combined interference from both laser types.
- Employed a probit model to establish the interference threshold.
Main Results:
- Pulsed lasers induced only transient interference, with amplitude linearly proportional to laser fluence.
- CW lasers caused significant, continuous amplitude reduction of the detector's response signal.
- CW laser interference became dominant at power densities ≥ 4.1 W/cm².
- Temporary detector blindness occurred at CW laser fluence of 6.1 W/cm².
Conclusions:
- Pulsed and CW lasers exhibit distinct interference mechanisms on PbS infrared detectors.
- CW laser interference poses a significant threat, potentially causing temporary detector blindness.
- Interference thresholds can be determined using a probit model, crucial for operational safety and reliability.

