Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Safety and Efficacy of Combined Coronary and Peripheral Percutaneous Revascularization: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Mario Enrico Canonico1,2, Nicola Verde1, Marisa Avvedimento1,3
1Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Insights
Concomitant percutaneous revascularization for coronary artery disease and lower extremity peripheral artery disease is safe and effective, showing similar outcomes to staged procedures. Further research is needed to confirm long-term results for multisite vascular disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LEPAD) often coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with multisite vascular disease (MVD).
- Percutaneous revascularization is established for both LEPAD and CAD, but evidence for combined procedures is limited.
- The feasibility of simultaneous LEPAD and CAD percutaneous revascularization is largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant versus staged percutaneous revascularization in patients with MVD.
- To evaluate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) as primary endpoints.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, single-center registry of 135 MVD patients between 2012 and 2021.
- Stratification into a concomitant group (n=45) undergoing simultaneous procedures and a deferred group (n=90) undergoing staged procedures within one year.
- Primary endpoints: MACE at one year and in-hospital CIN.
Main Results:
- Groups were well-balanced. Concomitant group had more single-vessel PCI, while the deferred group had multivessel PCI.
- One-year MACE incidence was similar: 37.8% in the concomitant group vs. 34.4% in the deferred group (p=0.61).
- In-hospital CIN rates were comparable: 11.1% vs. 8.9% (p=0.68).
Conclusions:
- MVD patients eligible for both CAD and LEPAD revascularization have a high cardiovascular risk profile.
- Concomitant coronary and lower extremity percutaneous revascularization appears safe and effective based on one-year MACE and CIN.
- Further dedicated studies are warranted to confirm short- and long-term outcomes of this strategy.
Abstract:
Background. Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LEPAD) frequently coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with multisite vascular disease (MVD). While percutaneous revascularization is well-established for both LEPAD and CAD, limited evidence exists for patients eligible for both procedures. Specifically, the feasibility of concomitant LEPAD and CAD percutaneous revascularization remains unknown. Objectives. To compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant coronary and lower extremity elective percutaneous revascularization. Methods. Between 2012 and 2021, we included 135 patients in an observational, retrospective single-center registry. The population was stratified into two groups: 45 patients (concomitant group) underwent simultaneous coronary and peripheral percutaneous interventions, and 90 patients (deferred group) underwent two separate procedures within one year. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at one year, while the primary safety endpoint was in-hospital contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Results. Study groups were well-balanced in baseline characteristics. In terms of coronary features, the concomitant revascularization group more often underwent single-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while the deferred group had multivessel PCI with diffuse coronary disease. No differences were detected in the number of LEPAD lesions between groups. For the primary efficacy endpoint, the incidence of MACE at one year was 37.8% in the concomitant group vs. 34.4% in the deferred group (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.64-2.10; p = 0.61). No significant differences were found in CIN occurrence between the concomitant and deferred groups (11.1% vs. 8.9%; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.36-4.21; p = 0.68). Conclusions. Multisite vascular disease patients eligible for CAD and LEPAD percutaneous revascularization exhibited a high cardiovascular risk profile with diffuse multivessel coronary and lower extremity disease. Our study suggests the efficacy and safety of concomitant coronary and lower extremity percutaneous revascularization based on one-year MACE incidence and in-hospital CIN. However, dedicated studies are warranted to confirm the short- and long-term outcomes of the concomitant revascularization strategy.
More Related Videos
08:12Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease I: Introduction
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care