Machine Learning and Statistical Shape Modelling Methodologies to Assess Vascular Morphology before and after Aortic...

Introduction: Statistical shape modelling (SSM) is used to analyse morphology, discover qualitatively and quantitatively unique shape features within a population, and generate mean shapes and shape modes that show morphological variability. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering is a machine learning analysis used to identify subgroups within a given population in relation to shape features. We tested the application of both methods in the clinically relevant scenario of patients undergoing aortic valve repair (AVR). Every year, around 5000 patients undergo surgical AVR in the UK. Aims: Evaluate aortic morphology and identify subgroups amongst patients who had undergone AVR, including Ozaki, Ross, and valve-sparing procedures using SSM and unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. This methodological framework can evaluate both pre- and post-surgical variability across subgroups undergoing different surgeries. Methods: Pre- (n = 47) and post- (n = 35) operative three-dimensional (3D) aortic models were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images. Computational analyses for SSM and hierarchical clustering were run separately for the two subgroups, assessing (a) ascending aorta only and (b) the whole aorta. This allows for exploring possible variations in morphological classification related to the input shape. Results: Most patients in the Ross procedure subgroup exhibited differences in aortic morphology from other subgroups, including an elongated ascending and wide aortic arch pre-operatively, and an elongated ascending aorta with a slightly enlarged sinus post-operatively. In hierarchical clustering, the Ross aortas also appeared to cluster together compared to the other surgical procedures, both pre-operatively and post-operatively. There were significant differences between clusters in terms of clustering distance in the pre-operative analyses (p = 0.003 for ascending aortas, p = 0.016 for whole aortas). There were no significant differences between the clusters in post-operative analyses (p = 0.47 for ascending, p = 0.19 for whole aorta). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of evaluating aortic morphology before and after different aortic valve surgeries using SSM and hierarchical clustering. This framework could be used to further explore shape features associated with surgical decision-making pre-operatively and, importantly, to identify subgroups whose morphology is associated with poorer clinical outcomes post-operatively. Statistical shape modelling (SSM) and unsupervised hierarchical clustering are two statistical methods that can be used to assess morphology, show morphological variations, with the latter being able to identify subgroups within a population. These methods have been applied to the population of aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients since there are different surgical procedures (traditional AVR, Ozaki, Ross, and valve-sparing). The aim is to evaluate aortic morphology and identify subgroups within this population before and after surgery. Computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance images were reconstructed into 3D models of the ascending aorta and whole aorta, which were then input into SSM and hierarchical clustering. The results show that the Ross aortic morphology is quite different from the other aortas. The clustering did not classify the aortas based on the surgical procedures; however, most of the Ross group did cluster together, indicating low variability within this surgical group.