Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

5.0K
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...
5.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer detection in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

BJU international·2026
Same author

BronchoLumen: analysis of recent YOLO-based architectures for real-time bronchial orifice detection in video bronchoscopy.

International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery·2026
Same author

Outcomes of patients undergoing Optilume<sup>®</sup> drug-coated balloon for different locations of urethral strictures: results from a multicenter cohort.

World journal of urology·2026
Same author

Correction: How safe is teaching radical cystectomy?

World journal of urology·2026
Same author

Development and Internal Validation of a Side-Specific Nomogram Integrating mpMRI and Biopsy Features to Guide Nerve-Sparing Decision Making in Prostate Cancer with Capsular Contact.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Very Late Extramedullary Relapse of Acute Myeloid Leukemia 13 Years After Allogeneic Transplant: A Case Report.

Case reports in hematology·2026
Same journal

Correction: Luca et al. Global and Regional Diagnostic Results of Progress Toward Cervical Cancer Elimination, According to the WHO Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review with Narrative Synthesis. <i>Diagnostics</i> 2026, <i>16</i>, 1224.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Association Between Systemic Inflammatory Response Biomarkers and Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Vertebrogenic Low Back Pain and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation: A Review of Mechanisms, Imaging-Driven Selection, and Clinical Outcomes.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Multivalvular Carcinoid Heart Disease: The Role of Echocardiography in Diagnosis and Selection for Heterotopic Bicaval Valve Implantation.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Data-Efficient and Explainable Multimodal Survival Prediction in NSCLC Using Deep Image Embeddings, Clinical Variables, and Gradient-Boosted Trees.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Anomalous Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery: Cinematic Volume Rendering Technique for Enhanced Anatomic Visualization.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Evaluation of Machine Learning Classification Models for False-Positive Reduction in Prostate Cancer Detection Using

Malte Rippa1,2, Ruben Schulze2, Georgia Kenyon3,4

  • 1Institute for Medical Informatics, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 10, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated machine learning (ML) and deep learning models for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis using MRI data. The research recommends specific ML models to enhance lesion segmentation and classification pipelines for improved accuracy.

Keywords:
deep learningmachine learningmedical imagingmultiparametric MRIprostate cancer

More Related Videos

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.5K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

147

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

21.5K
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

147

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis relies on accurate interpretation of MRI data.
  • Improving the segmentation and classification of prostate lesions is crucial for effective diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the performance of various machine learning (ML) and deep learning algorithms for prostate lesion segmentation and classification.
  • To identify optimal ML models for enhancing existing diagnostic pipelines.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated classical ML algorithms (SVMs, RDFs, MLPs) and deep learning models (CNNs like ConvNeXt, ConvNet, ResNet).
  • Utilized radiomic features with PCA or mRMR feature selection.
  • Compared performance on whole images and segmented regions (gland, peripheral zone, lesions), including transfer learning approaches.

Main Results:

  • Assessed the efficacy of different ML and deep learning architectures in binary classification of benign and malignant prostate tissues.
  • Compared various optimization strategies for segmentation and classification tasks.
  • Provided an exhaustive examination of ML model applicability in PCa diagnosis.

Conclusions:

  • The study offers insights into the performance of diverse ML approaches for prostate cancer detection.
  • Identified preferred ML models or families of models for optimizing upstream filtering in diagnostic pipelines.
  • Aimed to guide the selection of the best-suited ML model for improving prostate MRI analysis.