Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

14:14
Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
14.0K
Sex-related differences among patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement-a propensity score matched study
Andreas Zierer1,2, Ruggero De Paulis3, Farhad Bakhtiary4
1Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria.
Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
|August 11, 2024
Summary
Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) outcomes are comparable between sexes, even when accounting for higher baseline risk in females. This study found no significant differences in 2-year results after SAVR, highlighting similar effectiveness regardless of sex.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Medical Research
Background:
- Sex-based differences in cardiovascular disease presentation and outcomes are increasingly recognized.
- Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is a common procedure, but sex-related disparities in outcomes require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate sex-related differences in patient characteristics and 2-year outcomes following SAVR.
- To assess the impact of sex on SAVR outcomes using propensity-score matching (PSM).
Main Methods:
- Data from two prospective registries (INSPIRIS RESILIA Durability Registry and IMPACT) were merged.
- Propensity-score matching (PSM) was used to create comparable cohorts of male and female patients undergoing first-time SAVR.
- Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and 2-year clinical outcomes were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Females had a higher surgical risk profile (higher EuroSCORE II and STS scores) and required smaller aortic valves compared to males.
- Despite these differences, most baseline disparities vanished after PSM, except for higher risk scores in females.
- No significant differences in hospital stay, ICU stay, or 2-year post-SAVR outcomes were observed between sexes after PSM.
Conclusions:
- Females undergoing SAVR present with a higher surgical risk profile but achieve comparable 2-year outcomes to males.
- These findings suggest that SAVR is an effective treatment for both sexes, irrespective of baseline risk differences.

