Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
Published on: February 18, 2020
Outcomes of the Novel Supreme Drug-Eluting Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions: A PIONEER III Substudy
Kush P Patel1,2, Alexandra J Lansky3,4, Dean J Kereiakes5
1Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK.
Insights
The Supreme drug-eluting stent (DES) demonstrated comparable 1-year effectiveness and safety to durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in complex coronary lesions. This finding supports its use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for challenging arterial blockages.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- The Supreme drug-eluting stent (DES) is engineered to enhance endothelial healing, aiming to mitigate stent-related adverse events, particularly in complex coronary lesions.
- Complex lesions present a higher risk for adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 1-year clinical outcomes of the Supreme DES versus contemporary durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in patients with complex coronary lesions.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Supreme DES in a challenging patient subset.
Main Methods:
- The PIONEER III trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-blind study randomizing 1629 patients to either Supreme DES or DP-EES.
- 1137 patients with complex lesions (ACC/AHA type B2/C) were analyzed, with specific attention to severe calcification, long length, and severe tortuosity.
- The primary endpoint was target lesion failure at 1-year post-PCI.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in target lesion failure at 1 year between the Supreme DES and DP-EES groups (5.7% vs. 5.6%; HR 1.00, P=0.99).
- Secondary endpoints, including lesion success, device success, target vessel failure, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis, also showed no significant differences.
- A trend towards higher target lesion revascularization was noted with the Supreme DES (2.5% vs. 0.9%, P=0.06).
Conclusions:
- The Supreme DES exhibits comparable 1-year effectiveness and safety to DP-EES in patients with a wide range of complex coronary lesion characteristics.
- These findings suggest the Supreme DES is a viable option for percutaneous coronary intervention in complex lesion scenarios.
Background:
The Supreme healing-targeted drug-eluting stent (DES) is designed to promote endothelial healing to reduce stent-related adverse events. This may be particularly relevant among complex lesions that have a higher rate of adverse events. We sought to compare 1-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in complex lesions between the Supreme DES and contemporary durable-polymer, everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES).
Methods:
PIONEER III was a multicenter, prospective, single-blind clinical trial, randomizing 1629 patients with either an acute or chronic coronary syndrome in a 2:1 ratio to the Supreme DES or DP-EES. Complex lesions (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association type B2/C) were found in 1137 patients. Outcomes were also compared for specific parameters of lesion complexity: severe calcification, long length (>20 mm), and severe tortuosity. The primary end point was target lesion failure at 1 year.
Results:
At 1 year, there was no difference in target lesion failure between the Supreme DES and DP-EES: (5.7% vs 5.6%; hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.59-1.68, P = .99). Similarly, there were no differences in the secondary end points of lesion success (99.7% vs 99.4%, P = .41), device success (97.0% vs 98.5%, P = .14), target vessel failure (6.5% vs 7.4%, P = .50), major adverse cardiac events (7.8% vs 8.5%, P = .64), or stent thrombosis (0.7% vs 1.1%, P = .48). A trend was observed toward a higher rate of target lesion revascularization with the Supreme DES (2.5% vs 0.9%, P = .06).
Conclusions:
This study suggests that the Supreme DES is as effective and safe at 1 year compared with the standard DP-EES across a broad spectrum of lesion complexity.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
06:26Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care