Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Nondestructive Monitoring of Degradable Scaffold-Based Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessel Development Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: October 3, 2018
Evaluation of an Infrapopliteal Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold: Design Methodology for the LIFE-BTK Randomized
Ramon L Varcoe1, Sahil A Parikh2, Brian G DeRubertis3
1The Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
The Esprit BTK scaffold shows promise for treating critical limb ischemia below the knee. This randomized controlled trial evaluates its safety and efficacy compared to standard angioplasty for peripheral artery disease patients.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) affects 5-10% of peripheral artery disease patients, with limited FDA-approved below-the-knee (BTK) devices.
- Existing BTK treatments face high restenosis rates due to intimal hyperplasia, elastic recoil, and dissection, highlighting a need for improved scaffolding.
- The Esprit BTK system, a resorbable, drug-eluting scaffold, aims to address these limitations in infrapopliteal atherosclerosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esprit BTK drug-eluting resorbable scaffold.
- To compare the Esprit BTK scaffold against percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with CLTI.
- To assess the potential of novel scaffold devices in improving outcomes for challenging vascular conditions.
Main Methods:
- The LIFE-BTK randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 261 subjects with CLTI.
- The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of limb salvage and primary patency at 12 months.
- Primary safety endpoints included freedom from major adverse limb events (6 months) and peri-operative death (30 days), with 5-year follow-up planned.
Main Results:
- The study is a prospective premarket evaluation of the Esprit BTK scaffold.
- Results will determine the scaffold's effectiveness in limb salvage and maintaining artery patency.
- Safety data will be collected on major adverse limb events and peri-operative mortality.
Conclusions:
- Randomized controlled trials are crucial for evaluating novel devices like the Esprit BTK scaffold.
- Testing against the standard of care is essential for improving outcomes in CLTI patients.
- The LIFE-BTK trial will provide vital data on the safety and efficacy of resorbable scaffolds for BTK interventions.
Background:
Critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is a severe condition characterized by rest pain and ischemic tissue loss that affects 5% to 10% of people with peripheral artery disease. In the United States, there are few Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for the primary treatment of arteries below-the-knee (BTK). Unfortunately, all suffer from high restenosis rates due to intimal hyperplasia, elastic recoil, and untreated dissection because of a lack of scaffolding. The Esprit BTK system is a resorbable, drug-eluting scaffold device with the potential to address an unmet need in people suffering from CLTI because of infrapopliteal atherosclerosis. The LIFE-BTK (pivotaL Investigation of saFety and Efficacy of drug-eluting resorbable scaffold treatment-Below The Knee) randomized controlled trial (RCT) is a prospectively designed premarket evaluation of the Esprit BTK drug-eluting resorbable scaffold used in the treatment of those patients.
Methods:
The LIFE-BTK trial enrolled 261 subjects with CLTI for the RCT and a further 7 subjects for a pharmacokinetic substudy. The objective of the RCT was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Esprit BTK scaffold compared to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of limb salvage and primary patency at 12 months. The primary safety end point is freedom from major adverse limb events and peri-operative death at 6 months and 30 days, respectively. Clinical follow-up care is planned for 5 years.
Conclusions:
Novel devices must be tested in RCTs to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared to the standard of care if we are to improve outcomes for this challenging group of patients.
More Related Videos
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
09:23Optimizing Extracellular Vesicle Delivery Using a Core-Sheath 3D-Bioprinted Scaffold for Chronic Wound Management
Published on: February 28, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs