Candidate Screening for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Clinic by Fib-4 Index From Subclinical

Chisato Okamoto1,2, Osamu Tsukamoto1, Takuya Hasegawa3

  • 1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Frontier Biosciences, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

Gastro Hep Advances
|August 12, 2024
PubMed

Insights

The fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) index, a liver stiffness measure, can effectively screen for early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This simple index helps identify individuals needing further cardiac diagnostics in population-based screenings.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Hepatology
  • Public Health Screening

Background:

  • Early detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is challenging in mass screenings.
  • The fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) index, a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis, has not been widely explored as a potential screening tool for HFpEF.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of the Fib-4 index as a screening tool for identifying individuals at high risk for HFpEF.
  • To assess the correlation between the Fib-4 index and HFpEF risk stratification.
  • To determine if the Fib-4 index can predict clinical outcomes in a subclinical population.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 710 individuals without prior cardiovascular disease and preserved ejection fraction (EF ≥ 50%) from annual health checks (2006-2007) were analyzed.
  • Participants were stratified into HFpEF risk groups using the Heart Failure Association-PEFF (HFA-PEFF) score.
  • The Fib-4 index was calculated and correlated with HFA-PEFF scores and clinical outcomes.

Main Results:

  • The highest HFpEF risk group (HFA-PEFF score 4-6) exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis regarding all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization.
  • The Fib-4 index showed a significant correlation with HFpEF risk stratification (rs = 0.526).
  • Elevated Fib-4 index levels were independently associated with higher HFpEF risk and predicted adverse clinical events, including mortality and HF hospitalization.

Conclusions:

  • The Fib-4 index serves as a valuable tool for selecting individuals who require further specialized examination for HFpEF within a subclinical population.
  • This non-invasive marker offers a promising approach for improving early detection and risk stratification of HFpEF in community settings.
Abstract