Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Chayakrit Krittanawong1, Tania Ahuja2, Zhen Wang3,4
1From Cardiology Division, NYU Langone Health and NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Insights
Bivalirudin is a safer anticoagulant than unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes, reducing major bleeding risks. This meta-analysis confirms bivalirudin
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Outcomes of unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not definitively established.
- Existing data comparing these anticoagulants in ACS patients undergoing PCI requires systematic evaluation to clarify safety and efficacy profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze and compare PCI outcomes between unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
- To determine if bivalirudin offers a different safety profile, particularly concerning bleeding events, compared to unfractionated heparin in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science) from 1966 to January 2024.
- Ten prospective trials involving 42,253 patients with ACS undergoing PCI were included in the meta-analysis.
- Random-effects meta-analyses were employed to pool data and assess outcomes, with independent data review and consensus for conflict resolution.
Main Results:
- Unfractionated heparin was associated with significantly higher risks of major bleeding (RR: 1.68-1.87), non-access site complications (RR: 4.6), cardiovascular death (RR: 1.26), and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.67) compared to bivalirudin.
- No significant differences were observed between the two anticoagulants regarding all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, reinfarction, or target vessel revascularization.
- Specific bleeding outcomes, including trial-defined major bleeding and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding, were notably higher with unfractionated heparin.
Conclusions:
- Bivalirudin significantly reduces major bleeding events when used for anticoagulation during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
- The use of bivalirudin in this context is not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiovascular events compared to unfractionated heparin.
- These findings support bivalirudin as a preferred anticoagulant option for ACS patients undergoing PCI, emphasizing its favorable bleeding profile.
Introduction:
Data on outcomes between unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndromes remain inconclusive. We aimed to systematically analyze PCI outcomes by comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin.
Methods:
We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science from database inception in 1966 through January 2024 for studies evaluating PCI outcomes comparing unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin. Two investigators independently reviewed the data. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were used.
Results:
A total of 10 prospective trials were identified that enrolled 42,253 individuals who presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Our analysis found that heparin when compared to bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of trial-based definition of major bleeding [relative risk (RR): 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.20], nonaccess site complications (RR: 4.6, 95% CI: 1.75-12.09), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding (RR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.20-2.41), major bleeding risks (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.49-2.36), cardiovascular disease death (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.02-1.57), and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.07-2.62). There were no statistically significant differences between heparin and bivalirudin for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular event, stroke, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and acute or stent thrombosis.
Conclusions:
The present meta-analysis demonstrates bivalirudin reduces major bleeding when used for anticoagulation during PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes and is not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis or major adverse cardiovascular event.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...