Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
A health-conformant reading of the GDPR's right not to be subject to automated decision-making
1Law Centre for Health and Life, Amsterdam Law School, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
As the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare is expanding, patients in the European Union (EU) are increasingly subjected to automated medical decision-making. This development poses challenges to the protection of patients' rights. A specific patients' right not to be subject to automated medical decision-making is not considered part of the traditional portfolio of patients' rights. The EU AI Act also does not contain such a right. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) does, however, provide for the right 'not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing' in Article 22. At the same time, this provision has been severely critiqued in legal scholarship because of its lack of practical effectiveness. However, in December 2023, the Court of Justice of the EU first provided an interpretation of this right in C-634/21 (SCHUFA)-although in the context of credit scoring. Against this background, this article provides a critical analysis of the application of Article 22 GDPR to the medical context. The objective is to evaluate whether Article 22 GDPR may provide patients with the right to refuse automated medical decision-making. It proposes a health-conformant reading to strengthen patients' rights in the EU.
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care II
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Ethics and Bioethics
Ethics in Research
Legal Guidelines for Documentation

