Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Decompressive craniectomy in trauma: What you need to know
Georgios Solomou1, Jesvin Sunny, Midhun Mohan
1From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences (G.S., J.S., M.M., I.H., A.G.K. P.J.H.), Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.S.), London, United Kingdom; and Neurocenter (I.H.), Department of Neurosurgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical procedure for severe brain swelling. While not a cure-all, secondary DC can reduce mortality in refractory intracranial hypertension, but decisions require case-by-case evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Trauma Surgery
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Decompressive craniectomy (DC) involves removing a skull section to relieve intracranial pressure.
- Primary DC is used for acute subdural hematomas with brain swelling.
- Recent trials compare DC with craniotomy and evaluate its role in intracranial hypertension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current evidence on the efficacy and indications of decompressive craniectomy.
- To compare outcomes of primary DC versus craniotomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma.
- To assess the role of DC as a last-tier therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent randomized controlled trials and multicenter trials.
- Comparison of outcomes between decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy groups.
- Analysis of DC's effectiveness in mild, moderate, and refractory intracranial hypertension.
Main Results:
- Primary DC showed similar 12-month outcomes to craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma, with more wound complications in the DC group.
- Early neuroprotective DC for mild/moderate intracranial hypertension did not improve outcomes compared to medical management.
- Secondary DC as last-tier therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension reduced mortality and improved patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Secondary DC is valuable for managing intracranial hypertension post-traumatic brain injury but is not universally effective.
- The decision for DC should be individualized based on patient-specific factors.
- Further high-quality trials are needed to define optimal indications and techniques for various types of DC.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
Increased Intracranial Pressure l: Introduction

