Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodologies of affective classification.

P T Giblin

    The Journal of Genetic Psychology
    |June 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study reviews affective domain classification methods, including phenetic, cladistic, and ontological approaches. A systems analysis is proposed as the most effective method for classifying affective elements and their relationships.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Psychosocial measures in adolescent health: reflections on the impact of one's publication on subsequent published research.

    The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1992
    Same author

    Effects of a home visiting program on prenatal care and birthweight: a case comparison study.

    Journal of community health·1992
    Same author

    Development of a paraprofessional home visiting program for low-income mothers and infants.

    American journal of preventive medicine·1991
    Same author

    Issues in adolescent gynecologic care.

    Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America·1990
    Same author

    Effects of social supports on attitudes, health behaviors and obtaining prenatal care.

    Journal of community health·1990
    Same author

    Enhancing the adolescent reproductive process: efforts to implement a program for black adolescent fathers.

    Health care for women international·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Classification Theory

    Background:

    • The affective domain requires robust classification systems for understanding emotions and their relationships.
    • Existing methodologies like phenetic, cladistic, and ontological approaches have limitations in fully capturing the complexity of the affective domain.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically review and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of phenetic, cladistic, and ontological methodologies for classifying the affective domain.
    • To propose a systems analysis approach as a superior framework for affective domain classification.

    Main Methods:

    • A comprehensive literature review of existing affective domain classification methodologies.
    • Comparative analysis of the merits and deficiencies of phenetic, cladistic, and ontological approaches.
    • Development and presentation of a systems analysis framework for affective domain classification.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Phenetic, cladistic, and ontological methods offer different perspectives but have inherent limitations in classifying the affective domain.
    • A systems analysis approach effectively addresses key classification functions: grouping elements, emphasizing autonomy and homonomy, indicating relatedness, and structural representation.
    • Illustrative applications demonstrate the utility of the proposed systems analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • A systems analysis provides a more comprehensive and adequate framework for classifying the affective domain compared to existing methods.
    • This approach enhances the structural representation and understanding of abstract conceptualizations within the affective domain.