A critical review of clinician-directed nudges

Briana S Last1, Rinad S Beidas2, Katelin Hoskins3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Psychology Building B, Room 358, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.

PubMed

Insights

Nudges, or subtle choice architecture changes, show limited clinical decision improvements and can backfire. Healthcare systems should focus on structural interventions over these light-touch approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Health policy
  • Behavioral economics
  • Clinical decision-making

Background:

  • Nudges, subtle changes to choice presentation, have grown popular in policy.
  • Healthcare systems widely adopted nudges for clinical decision improvement.
  • Recent research highlights significant limitations and potential harms of nudges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and unintended consequences of nudges in healthcare.
  • To advocate for a shift from nudges to more comprehensive interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent research on nudge interventions in clinical settings.
  • Analysis of potential backfire effects and crowd-out phenomena.
  • Examination of structural factors influencing health outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Nudges offer modest benefits in some clinical decision contexts.
  • Nudges, especially electronic health record alerts, can backfire with unintended consequences.
  • Nudges may divert attention from crucial structural determinants of health.

Conclusions:

  • The limitations and risks of nudges necessitate a reevaluation of their use in healthcare.
  • Future interventions should prioritize multi-level, structurally focused strategies over light-touch nudges.
  • Addressing root causes of poor health requires moving beyond behavioral nudges.

Related Concept Videos

Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.8K
Humanistic Psychology01:24

Humanistic Psychology

Humanistic psychology emerged in the mid-20th century as a response to the deterministic and pessimistic nature of behaviorism and psychoanalysis. While behaviorism focused on observable behaviors influenced by the environment and psychoanalysis delved into unconscious motivations, both theories suggested that human actions lacked free will. In contrast, humanistic psychology offers a perspective that emphasizes the innate potential for goodness and growth within every individual.
This approach...
1.1K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.3K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
879
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.6K