Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Optimal Revascularization Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Hyo-Hyun Kim1, Myeongjee Lee2, Kyung-Jong Yoo3
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ilsan Hospital, Go-Yang, South Korea.
Insights
For acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 24 hours significantly reduces adverse events. Delayed CABG within 3 days also shows better outcomes than 1-2 day surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Public Health
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) poses a significant global health challenge.
- Optimal timing for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in AMI patients is debated.
- This study aims to clarify the impact of CABG timing on postoperative outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the optimal timing for CABG in patients with AMI.
- To evaluate the effect of different CABG timings on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for improving patient outcomes after AMI.
Main Methods:
- Nationwide retrospective analysis of Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2007-2018).
- Included 1,705,843 adult AMI patients undergoing CABG within one year of diagnosis.
- Patients categorized by CABG timing; primary endpoints included time interval from AMI to CABG; secondary endpoints were MACCEs and medication impact.
Main Results:
- 20,172 patients underwent CABG.
- CABG within 24 hours of AMI diagnosis showed the best outcomes, reducing cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.
- Delayed CABG within 3 days was superior to surgery between 1-2 days post-AMI.
- Postoperative aspirin use correlated with improved MACCE outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Performing CABG within 24 hours of AMI diagnosis minimizes myocardial injury, highlighting the importance of rapid revascularization.
- Delayed CABG within 3 days yielded better results than surgery within 1-2 days.
- These findings support optimizing CABG timing to reduce morbidity and mortality in AMI patients.
Introduction:
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major global health concern. However, the optimum timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in AMI patients remains controversial. This study investigated the optimal timing of CABG and its impact on postoperative outcomes. We hypothesized that determining the optimal timing of CABG could positively impact postoperative outcomes.
Methods:
We conducted a nationwide retrospective analysis of the National Health Insurance Service of Korea database, focusing on 1 705 843 adult AMI patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2018 who underwent CABG within 1 year of diagnosis. Patients were categorized based on CABG timing. Primary endpoints included cohort identification and the time interval from AMI diagnosis to CABG. Secondary endpoints encompassed major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and the impact of postoperative medications.
Results:
Of the patients, 20 172 underwent CABG. Surgery within 24 h of AMI diagnosis demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, reducing cardiac death, myocardial infarction recurrence, and target vessel revascularization. Delayed CABG within 3 days also outperformed surgery within 1-2 days post-AMI. Additionally, postoperative aspirin use was associated with improved MACCE outcomes.
Conclusion:
CABG within 24 h of AMI diagnosis was associated with significantly minimized myocardial injury, emphasizing the critical role of rapid revascularization. Delayed CABG within 3 days related to better outcomes compared with that of surgery within 1-2 days. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for optimizing CABG timing in AMI patients, consequentially reducing morbidity and mortality.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

