Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 5, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Five-Year Outcomes of Bioresorbable Stent Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Fei-Fei Yang1, Hui Song1, Wei-Bin Qin2
1Graduate School, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, 530000 Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Insights
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) show similar cardiac mortality to metallic stents after five years. However, BVS have higher rates of revascularization, thrombosis, and failure, indicating significant drawbacks for coronary heart disease treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Biomaterials Science
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- The long-term efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) versus metallic stents for coronary heart disease is debated.
- A comprehensive review of five-year clinical outcomes for BVS is lacking.
- This study addresses the controversy by analyzing five-year results from randomized controlled trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze five-year clinical outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) compared to metallic stents.
- To evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of BVS in treating coronary heart disease.
- To provide evidence-based insights into the long-term performance of BVS.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of databases from inception to June 30th, 2023.
- Inclusion of high-quality randomized controlled trials with low risk of bias.
- Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes at the five-year follow-up point.
Main Results:
- Five high-quality randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis.
- At five years, bioresorbable stents demonstrated comparable cardiac mortality rates to metallic stents.
- Bioresorbable stents showed inferior outcomes regarding lesion revascularization, in-stent thrombosis, target lesion failure, target vessel failure, and myocardial infarction.
Conclusions:
- Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) are comparable to metallic stents concerning cardiac mortality at five years.
- Significant drawbacks, including higher rates of revascularization and adverse events, necessitate careful clinical consideration for BVS use.
- The findings suggest that metallic stents may remain the preferred option for certain patient populations due to superior long-term safety and efficacy profiles.
Background:
The efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) compared to metallic stents for the treatment of coronary heart disease remains controversial. The analysis of clinical outcomes at five years following the initial treatment has yet to be reviewed. This study sought to assess the five-year outcomes in randomized controlled trials of BVS in the treatment of coronary heart disease using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods:
A systematic database search was conducted from their inception to June 30th, 2023 using various Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms including: "Coronary Disease", "Bioresorbable stent", "Randomized controlled trials".
Results:
After a rigorous selection process, a total of five high-quality articles were finally included in this study. Each trial demonstrated a low risk of bias. After 5 years, bioresorbable stents showed outcomes similar to conventional metal stents in terms of cardiac mortality. However, they were inferior in terms of lesion revascularization rates, in-stent thrombosis rates, target lesion failure, target vessel failure, and myocardial infarction.
Conclusions:
While bioresorbable stents are comparable to metallic stents in terms of cardiac mortality rates, they exhibit significant drawbacks that warrant clinical consideration.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management

